Forum Moderators: martinibuster
We recently changed the anchors of these links into our keywords. Thought it would be good for the search engines (read: Google). Now we are slowly dropping in the SERPs. Where we used to rank high, we are now only found at the 6th or 7th page of the SERPs.
At the same time I see more and more sites are taking out these links at the bottom of their pages.
Did I miss something? Should we take these links out? Is interlinking 50 sites really not done now? Am I on dangarous grounds?
I saw a network of sites taking out the links at the bottom and now they are ranking higher. Is it possible that Google is deducting own links from the backward links of other sites? (Just a theory)
Dump the "network" approach, and use a pyramid as dougs suggests, or split into different groups, etc. Try to get good external linkage for as many sites as possible, as this may mitigate the "closed network" appearance of any interlinking you do.
I would recommend drawing out on a large piece of paper which third party sites link to which of your sites and then draw your sites as you have done.....once you have it on paper you will see what a search engine spider sees...then remove the stuff that does not make sense.
We are now trying to make the links follow themes between sites....ie...if you have a site about USA travel, then link it to a USA finance site, then link this to a European finance site, then link this to a European hotel site....etc etc. Everything then connects how it should do and by having many third party inbounds on each site everything becomes natural.
Doug
Drop the excessive cross linking, minimize it tremendously, and do at least a 3 to 1 balance. For every external links, add one link from a site in your network.
Eventually, you can apply all your domains again, but your linkage structure has to be very carefully crafted.