Forum Moderators: rogerd
Is Wikipedia safe from libel liability? [news.com.com]
In order to avoid legal liability, what do you think it would take to make a forum into an ASP?
Furthermore, if everyone has anonymous identities, can they libel each other?
"It's a fascinating issue," she said. "Because here you have Wikipedia, which is a great thing, which was able to flourish and thrive because of the absence of liability. On the other hand, the collaborative, decentralized nature of it means pieces of it are broken, and it's unavoidable. So the question is what can we do to stop this in the future and at what price?"
I thought that was interesting. However, I guess, a lot of people around here probably don't like Wikipedia too much..
I think the key point is this: "One of the reasons Congress passed the (CDA) was to encourage service providers and other who make their space on the Internet available to do monitoring without assuming liability..." To me, that means that you can moderate your forum without automatically assuming full liability for every bit of content on it.
As far as an anonymous poster being libeled, I doubt if ScarecrowDude could sue the forum if Moondog66 called him a liar and a fool. But, if Moondog66 posted a lengthy diatribe along the lines of "Acme Widgets is a SCAM, and will file for bankruptcy next month", Acme Widgets, Inc., might have a case against someone. One hopes that the target of the suit would be ol' Moondog66, and at most the forum owner would have to provide identifying info if so ordered by a court.
Note that being "right" may have little to do with your not getting sued. A deep-pockets opponent can sue and wreak havoc with you even if you prevail in the final judgment.