Forum Moderators: rogerd
Adapting the old poem, it would go something like this:
Lizzie Borden had an axe,
Gave the members forty whacks.
And when the job was nicely done,
She gave more members forty-one.
Of course, it could also be a "he" but you get the drift of it, don't you? What do you think?
The other end of the spectrum is the Mary Poppings approach like you mention by wrapping members up in cotton wool and treading carefully so you don't upset anyone, both ways are acceptable to a certain percentage of members.
You just have to choose what side of the fence you want to be on, wrapped up in cotton wool and fed a spoon full of sugar or someone coming at you from every angle with a machete...me personally "bring on the machete" ;)
Haha, be careful what you ask for, you might get it. ;)
I've said it before, but perhaps it bears repeating - forum populations are self-selecting. Aggressive, sarcastic mods definitely aren't everyone's cup of tea, but some people will enjoy that kind of environment. People will gravitate to forums where they enjoy the other members and where the moderation is in synch with the members (and the forum mission). If the forum mission and TOS demand a high level of courtesy, then you will tend to cultivate a polite membership and moderators who also do their work in a courteous and unobtrusive manner.
In a wide-open, free-wheeling forum, a mod may have to be more like the bouncer in a biker bar, i.e., even bigger and meaner than the clientele - and remind people of it often. :)