Forum Moderators: phranque
I feel that it is not enough to use statistics (e.g. online travel bookings rise by xx%) or keyword tools in order to understand how to best organise information on a site and decide what content would best answer users' questions. I suspect there are real benefits in getting close and personal with the audience even though this may require a lot of time and effort.
So far I've come up with a list of tools (compiled from posts here and other resources) that could help the average webmaster get a better understanding of the targeted audience whether it's people interested in a certain subject/product/service etc.
I have not tried many of them yet so can't say whether it's worth the effort or not. I would appreciate it if you could add to the list or give feedback on the above list.
One thing this sort of research could help with is organising information on your site.
Say most sites in your field opt for categories like widget1, widget2, widget3, categories the publisher feels are most important. But this type of research, through various means, might reveal that this sort of information structure is not exactly what the visitors expect to see; to them, other categories might be far more important.
The above is an example and I guess it could be done through usability testing as well. But does anyone know how many successful, content sites go to the trouble to do this sort of research and if yes, how it has affected the performance of the site?
Finding a website that is sort of the center in the particular field you are working in is also a good way to get a grasp on your visitors.
Often you find out that those sites miss certain functions or content and that's a way of making your site a bit special by adding those missing bits.