Forum Moderators: phranque
Your probably seeing a lot of requests for it because IE6 has Privacy/Cookie options that are directly controlled by your P3P policy.
If you don't have a P3P policy and use compact policy headers then you'll probably find that a lot of your cookies are being rejected.
See the W3c P3P section [w3.org] for details.
A good policy generator tool makes implementation a bit easier.
I use the IBM PolicyEditor [alphaworks.ibm.com] which is free.
I would have thought quite a few though. Privacy is becoming an increasing public concern and IE6 has a View->Privacy Report.. option that requests the xml file and produces a readable summary of it.
I'd say its definitely worth the trouble if you use cookies - because it greatly increases the chances they will be accepted.
www.w3.org/P3P/
There are a few big names but mostly they are smaller sites, plus as the page becomes more well known it's also starting to attract spamy links (IMO).
- Tony
I decided to check on some of the bigger players in the internet world..
The thing is... the big players can afford not to have a proper privacy policy as most users will be happy to override their privacy settings on a per-site basis for the big, well-known names.
It's the same situation as ActiveX/browser extensions - I'm a lot happier installing an extension from a company I know (like the Microsoft Update extension or Macromedia Flash) than I am installing one from Joe Bloggs Plumbing Supplies plc. :)
[w3.org...]