Forum Moderators: phranque
<table border="0" width="100%" style="font-family: serif; font-size: 1pt;" cellspacing="1" height="1">
<tr>
<td width="100%" height="1">
<font size="1" color="#xxxxxx">
<span style="font-family: serif; font-size: 1pt">
font specs partially changed to protect the "innocent" but there's no bgcolor indicated in the body tag, and the font color in the body tag is "black"...the actual font color used is identical to the color of the background image itself. I checked it.
It's none of my business, but I've been wondering what the possible outcome of this might be, and keep going back to look. I'm a worrier. This is being used on client sites as well, who I'm sure don't have a clue. There are also multiple title tags.
Is this a new twist on an old trick? Am I concerned for nothing?
<table border="0" width="100%" style="font-family: serif; font-size: 1pt;" cellspacing="1" height="1">
<tr>
<td width="100%" height="1">
<font size="1" color="#xxxxxx">
<span style="font-family: serif; font-size: 1pt">
The part that does concern me is the 1 pixel high table specification, the 1 pixel high TD, and the font size being specified as 1 and 1 point.
This is hiding the text on the splash pages effectively, but I am just wondering if spam filters will pick up using the tables this way to hide text. I would think this was an accidental work-around if it weren't for the multiple title tags.
It's not any of my business if the person gets their clients banned - I just like to know what the "no-no's" are so I can avoid them in advance.