Anyone else see that thread at the top of the active list. I must have posted in my previous life :)
JonB
3:41 pm on May 1, 2003 (gmt 0)
lol,yes.i see..
ritch_b
3:47 pm on May 1, 2003 (gmt 0)
Somebody's been waiting a hellishly long time for their answer!
R.
takagi
3:53 pm on May 1, 2003 (gmt 0)
Jan 1 1970 0:00am is the earliest date/time in some Operating Systems. It looks this thread is just 1 minute (or 1 split second) before that moment.
lazerzubb
3:56 pm on May 1, 2003 (gmt 0)
Don't know why it happend, i think i saw something similar yesterday, quite a few active threads at the moment: May be explained here: [webmasterworld.com...]
sem4u
4:04 pm on May 1, 2003 (gmt 0)
Webmasterworld has been around a long time :)
anallawalla
7:04 am on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0)
I saw this behaviour on 27/4 and have uploaded a screen dump here [snurl.com]. It only lasted a few minutes. It was soon followed by a sticky from a moderator, so I wonder if the splitting of a thread causes that for a moment.