Oaklands defense is really not that great. Tampa's defense is the best. Oakland has incredible offense, but again tampa's defense is the best. I just don't want to see a lot of bad calls this time. The play offs were plagued by them.
tigger
6:36 pm on Jan 26, 2003 (gmt 0)
don't they have goalies? the score does seem high :)
jaybee
6:44 pm on Jan 26, 2003 (gmt 0)
>don't they have goalies?
LOL :)
jaybee
bateman_ap
6:49 pm on Jan 26, 2003 (gmt 0)
I thought you would be talking about Chelsea/Shrewsbury!
Come on the blues (or white as we are playing in today!)
chameleon
8:47 pm on Jan 26, 2003 (gmt 0)
Tampa Bay 27 Oakland 23
Shakil
9:10 pm on Jan 26, 2003 (gmt 0)
Tampa Bay 27 Oakland 23 ==========================
seems a bit unfair that One team has MORE players than the other, and even you guys cant figure that out, looking at the numbers above.
Shak
mat_bastian
9:15 pm on Jan 26, 2003 (gmt 0)
what was that about gorillas scoring to get high? ;)
mat_bastian
9:17 pm on Jan 26, 2003 (gmt 0)
Hopefully and god willing, Tampa will be embarrassed...
Beaten to a pulp.
Hunter
2:05 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
Wow, still 3rd Q but this game is over...that last Tampa interception has sealed the deal....hope those Raider fans don't trash Oakland again...oh wait, thats just when they win...go figure
mahlon
3:16 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
LOL, love the last 4 minutes! :)
C R U S H E D
[edited by: mahlon at 3:18 am (utc) on Jan. 27, 2003]
pageoneresults
3:17 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
Tampa Bay 48 Oakland 21
Final!
jaybee
3:28 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
So sad. :( I couldn't even look at the second half.
Where was the real Raiders team.
Too much D and O rack them hard.
Knowles
4:06 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
Where was the real Raiders team.
That was the real Raiders team, bucs are just better. Sometimes the team no one wants to cheer for is the best team. I figure most reports of the game will have something like what happened to the Raiders. The bucs havent gotten due respect all year.
coconutz
4:18 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
Raiders' looked pathetic today. This long time fan was definitely disappointed. :(
mat_bastian
4:29 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
<"Raiders' looked pathetic today. This long time fan was definitely disappointed."
I feel your pain... I watched them all year and they just looked off. Remember the four game slide early in the season... that's what this reminded me of, just like the KC game... very disappointing.
Not a longtime Raiders fan, but I watched my Packers lay an egg, so I'm right there with ya.
Brett_Tabke
4:36 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
Well, I'm a long time broncos fan, which means I don't like (to put it mildly) anything Al Davis touches.
It's also nice to see one of the newer teams (hey - bucs came into the league in what? 78?) win for a change. The old guard has dominated for so many years.
msr986
4:52 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
Although I'm in Southern California, I'm not disappointed that the Raiders lost. However I would have preferred a closer game. The Raiders really choked.
coconutz
5:01 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
The Bucs played great defense today. Very deserving win.
I don't care for Al Davis at all, but I'm still a Raiders' fan. What he did to Marcus Allen was sad.
Superbowl record 5 interceptions for the league's MVP, how sad is that?
giggle
5:19 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
Even better: Manchester United 6 West Ham 0!
msr986
7:43 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
> ....hope those Raider fans don't trash Oakland again...oh wait, thats just when they win...go figure
No, also when they lose. I just saw the news, they trashed Oakland again tonight.
bateman_ap
1:10 pm on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)
Grrr, was going to put a bet on Tampa to win by at least 10 last night but bloody Blue Square was so slow it wouldn't accept my bet.