Forum Moderators: open
Is this happening elsewhere? Does the Surgeon General need to warn us that Wi-Fi is dangerous to our health?
Mobile/cell phones are a bit different, since there have been pretty varied studies on the effects of those, some of which are slightly concerning.
There is a group of people who claim to be allergic to WiFi signals.... they call it Electrosensitivity many have outfitted their homes with tin foil or other material that they feel.. keeps the signals out.
In Santa Fe a group is trying to ban Wi-Fi in public buildings claiming that they won't be able to come to public building because of their "condition"
[crn.com...]
Santa Fe City Councilor Ron Trujillo battled back, saying Santa Fe residents need to get with the times and embrace wireless technology, noting that the city is already blanketed by wireless signals."It's not 1692, it's 2008," Trujillo said. "Santa Fe needs to embrace this technology. It's not going away."
Essex did a study in July of 2007 and found that...
Subjects were unable to distinguish whether the signal was present or absent.
Here is the original academic paper. (PDF)
[badscience.net...]
I would think, to avoid wiffy or other such, one would have to move far, far away...
I would love the city to ask some of these people to prove their ailment.
Hmmm.... maybe I could narrow it down to the exact TV station that's making me ill if I get them to cycle their broadcasts on and off.
I would cover my house in tin foil if I could afford to cool it after that.
I think the new HD radio signal is getting to me too and making my hair gray.... or maybe that's XM or Sirius. I guess I should sue them all. Maybe I'll start with my iPone, work over Cisco, radio, TV, satellite, etc. Oh, let's not forget about the people who are allergic to ULF signals used by the Navy.
This whole thing is so absurd it's funny. Nobody's allergic to radio waves. Give them a placebo pill, tell them it is the new cure for electrosensitivity and they'll be fine.