Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Ouch!

Darwin awards contender

         

appi2

7:24 pm on Nov 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

LifeinAsia

8:14 pm on Nov 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



At this point, not a contender for the full award, possibly an honorable mention.

It's required that death results from the stupidity (thus removing the person from the gene pool).

adb64

8:34 pm on Nov 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How stupid can you be!

Someone actually [shot a bottle rocket out of a body orifice].

[video links snipped]

[edited by: lawman at 11:36 pm (utc) on Nov. 9, 2006]

Pengi

10:09 pm on Nov 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Would it be a sufficient qualification for membership just to remove the means of procreation!

dcheney

10:58 pm on Nov 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Pengi,

Yes, that is enough to qualify. The key is that they are unable to pass on their genes to a new generation.

sonny

3:16 am on Nov 10, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Had it pointing the wrong way?

jsinger

7:18 am on Nov 10, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"And also the body naturally produces methane gas, so combine that with the firework and the exploding effect with methane's flammability - it certainly could have been a lot worse than it really was."

!