Forum Moderators: open
There are usually limits as to what configurations a device like this can handle. Sometimes the error is an indication you've reached the upper end of it's capabilities and sometimes it just means the resolution you've selected is not supported.
Chapman
The previous driver probably didn't 'care' if a configuration might be invalid while the XP driver (which now goes through a rather rigorous certification process) seems to be erroring on the side of caution... since we know the configuration was previously achievable.
You may be able to locate a different (although probably non-certified) driver by Googling your display device information or as I said in my previous post... you may be able to find another resolution that works.
Chapman
sounds like the refresh rate for your monitor / and or your graphics card ..doesnt like the signal your box is telling it to use ..
as mentioned ..is really a hardware question ..whats the specs of what you have ( box and screen ) and what are you trying to make it go to ..
It was working previously at higher res, however I have just installed windows XP pro, do you reckon that may have caused the problem?
What was your previous OS? 98? It's entirely possible the driver is not XP compatible. Dig around for how to check this (sorry not available at the moment, my search button is off the clock. :-) )
the specs quoted by MS as being needed to run XP pro are very approximative ..one can run it with lower than the required specs ( and it will run OK ) and higher and it will not ..
as always .."he who dies with the most RAM wins " this also includes RAM on the chip ..and the type of MOBO ..
AMD 6 is considered to be the minimum needed to run XP PRO with 64 megs of RAM ( yes it will work ..but it will be finicky and kludgy if you want to run heavy apps like adobe "anything" or zonelarm firewalls and or firefox after 1.00 ) ..even if they are running in the background ..norton AV ( I digress here for a laugh at the acronym )will bring it to near standstill and make you long for 98II ..
doze specs say pentium II ( and for most anything else you could say ...in that case I have this here celeron 400 equivalent ..usually shipped on laptops ..even toshiba ..and so it will run as easy as 98II does on a desktop ..)
NOT SO ..:((
so what is the exact spec of your machine ..and if you know how to access the info ..what is it configed to run at start up ..
and what is the monitor ..
the more detailed info you can give ..the more chance you have that between us all we can find an easy free solution ..( tweak ) or a slighty more painfull ( hardware swap ) one ..