Forum Moderators: open
How the heck would you go about estimate something like that? I heard once Jessica Simpson had a really high IQ, that is when I decided that IQs really don't mean anything.
All the really smart Mensa members I have had contact with all have the same problem when dealing with problem solving or trouble shooting.
They arrive at the correct answer early in their equations, but then keep analyzing and reanalyzing the problem, putting the correct answer down and questioning if it is correct or not. Usually resulting in some uber clever method of doing something that doesn't work as it is too complicated or drawn out, when the origianl answer they arrived at quickly was all that was needed.
They end up outsmarting themselves 8 times out of 10.
[edited by: Demaestro at 5:27 pm (utc) on Sep. 1, 2006]
We worship the ground that mega-athletes walk on and track with fevered intensity the "clubs" they join to prove it.
We follow the lives of those who are beautiful like our own lives depended on it and shell out literally billions of dollars a year to see them projected on screens both big and small.
But god forbid that anyone "admit" they are smart rather than strong or pretty.
There's no way to "estimate" the IQ of a person.
Either they have made a test or they haven't. In the first case you know the IQ, in the second you don't. Any "estimation" is just a wild guess, and has the same significance as any other random number.
I'm not too sure about that.
I've estimated my own IQ at 220. Not only am I smart enough to estimate my own IQ, but now that it's been estimated, I also have the credentials to tell you that an IQ can be estimated.
No one likes a thrasonical egghead.
But that's really my point.
We have no problem with someone saying "Hey, I am good at basketball because I am strong so I am going to try out for the basketball team".
We have no problem with someone saying, "I am pretty so I am going to Hollywood to become an actor or model."
But when someone says "I am smart and I am going to join a group of other smart people", we get all up in arms about it.
It is a measurable quality. It's not like you make it up. Why are people so ashamed of it?
Intelligence is one human quality. According to that list, Hitler and Napolean would have qualified for Mensa. Lincoln, Washington and Jefferson would have been denied entry...
People are not the same but people like hanging out with people who are similar. Why bring down people who do so on one measure but not another?
Belonging to a club does not dictate greatness. High IQ, great strength or fine beauty never garunteed success, so why are we offended that great people are left from one list but not another?
It does not reflect either a person's interests or anything they've actually accomplished. So it's a pretty feeble measure of whether you're in fact joining a club of people who are "similar".
[edited by: buckworks at 8:56 pm (utc) on Sep. 1, 2006]
What I'm saying is that maybe those sports heroes should exercise a little humility, much like Walter Payton did. He was the guy that had this to say about endzone celebrations-
“when you score, act like you've been there before!”
Besides, it's not about intelligence, but the application of that intelligence. Now, care to discuss the limitations and biases of I.Q. tests?
much like Walter Payton did
Yes, strutting around saying "I am so great b/c I am part of this group" no matter what this is comes across as crass, but simply being a part or admitting you belong is not shameful, yet when it comes to intelligence, we make people feel that it is.
So it's a pretty feeble measure of whether you're in fact joining a club of people who are "similar".
IQ is a general common identifyer that then gets broken down into further groups within the club. And Mensa, Hollywood, or profesional sports all have those sub-cultures as well. It is a starting point to find those people we have things in common with.
and yeah ..trainspotting is one word ..actually half of one word ..the other half being anorak ..no hyphen ..or "interveiwedontvsportspersonalitywhohasalowerlevelintellectthanmypetdogandwhosopinionsandconversationsarelessinterestingthanhers
[edited by: Leosghost at 10:24 pm (utc) on Sep. 1, 2006]
I was heavily recruited by mensa coming out of high school
So maybe mensa doesn't recruit (which is understandable because when was the last time you paid $60 to watch someone debate an issue or figure out a math problem), but I hear G has been making some recruiting efforts based on using one's IQ. Wasn't that one of their ads for applying along those lines? I can't find it now, but I remember something like that - "High IQ? - Come work for us."
I don't think raw IQ in itself means much, unless you use it for important things. Eisntein would have been just as smart in the test had he decided to chill and take up gardening. Sure he could've been the greatest garderner ever lived, but I doubt we would know his name.