Forum Moderators: buckworks
A few weeks ago we received a phone call on Friday night wanting to cancel a reservation for Sunday. Since it was before the deadline, we said we would only charge the cancellation fee, not the first night's rate. The person then said the printout she had specified a full refund if cancelled before the deadline. I said there was no such wording on our site. She insisted that's what it said and would send me the copy when she returned home from her trip.
Yesterday, she sent me the html file that she said she saved when she made the reservation. I looked at it, and sure enough, it said "full refund." I immediately looked at the page on our site, which of course did not say it.
I looked at her page again and saw that all the graphics were showing as missing when trying to display. So I looked at the source file to see what was going on. The first thing I noticed is that all the HTML table files were nicely lined up with tabs (as opposed to on our site where almost everything is flush to the left). The second thing I noticed is that all the graphics links had been changed to something like ""../../Dreamweaver/test" prefixing the file name.
I wrote back to her and called her on the fact that the file had been edited with Dreamweaver.
Haven't heard back from her. :)
So I explained that we haven't specified a "full refund" since we started charging for cancellations over a year ago and that we've never used Dreamweaver on our site.
I said that whoever made the printout apparently tried to help her out and doctor the page for her. I told her I was sorry she was misled by her friend, but the cancellation charge still stands.
We get this type of chargebacks now and again. One involved a customer who order two widgets from us. On receiving them, she then told us that she only needed one of them and will return the other. What happened next was that she raised a chageback against us saying that she had only received one widget. The chargeback went ahead despite she agreeing to withdraw it and admitted to having received both widgets.
gain a long term customer. - Thats an odd spelling of thief
I totally agree with you there. That sounds like a customer I would not want to keep and would probably refuse to do business with in the future. BUT, as was said earlier, fighting a chargeback on this is a losing battle. Unfortunately, the customer will always win (in the USA). And, you'll be stuck with a chargeback fee of $15-$30 plus the original $15. Now you're out $30-$45 instead of $15 and potentially created a person who will be out for revenge and tell other people to avoid you (insted of just being happy that they screwed you out of the money and being quite). As criminal as it is, refunding the small amount of money is just much easier.
I found this thread very interesting to read as I have had similar problems recently. I am part of a business that runs an ecommece site in New Zealand. We recently had a couple of people attempt to charge back goods for apparently no reason at all.
After sending required info to banks we havn't heard anything more.
I just didn't realise how many dodgy people are out there.
If someone "stole" money off me the way the $15.00 lady was trying to do - i would never do business with them again (although I would probably have given her the refund to avoid hassles first)
:)
A merchant that gives customer special treatment will often gain a long term customer.
This mantra has been around for ages, and it has never been 100% true.
There are about 1% of customers that are simply not worth the effort of dealing with. There are a small minority of customers that simply cannot be pleased by anyone for any reason.
Those are the ones we send to our competitors.
In the case mentioned, I would never have refunded the money - not because $15 is a big deal, but because of the attempted fraud involved. If they had simply explained something like "we had an unavoidable change of plans", I would have been happy to refund it - but when they resort to dirty tricks all the rules change.
I agree. And what's worse is the CC companies automatically accept the story of the customer rather than the merchant, when it comes to chargebacks. I've submitted my 'documentation' many times only to lose in the end!