Forum Moderators: buckworks

Message Too Old, No Replies

Are simulated product photos bad?

Replacing photos with 3D

         

dpd1

3:02 am on Aug 24, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Without going into details... A lot of my products are a big pain in the butt to be photographed. I was looking at some 3D renderings the other day. Some of these 3D apps are getting incredibly good at producing lifelike images. I was thinking of starting to design my stuff in 3D anyway. So then I thought... Well, what if I just used those images as the product images. One potential problem... Is that unethical. I guess you could get around that by just putting up a disclaimer. But.. How much of a ding would that put in a potential customer's confidence about that product? My thinking was that I could also just have a random gallery of our products, to show off the quality overall... That could possibly negate the possibility of people being nervous about not seeing an actual photo. These are not items that are purchased for their looks btw... They're mechanical/functional more than anything. But still... Obviously quality can be determined by looking at something. Overall, my gut tells me it's best to have an actual photo. Especially since I think that has really helped me, as I notice most other people who sell what I sell have terrible little photos. Mine are big and well done. But still... Not having to go through the hassle is very tempting.

tangor

4:57 am on Aug 24, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



If it costs more than a dollar... I'd use a real photo. Depending on the physical size of the product(s) (ie. something small like a ring or a jacket or larger like a car or airplane) and the number of items, you might want to invest in photographic lighting, tilt-table and appropriate camera to produce CONSISTENT images. A setup like this can speed things up tremendously and cuts down on image manipulation post shooting.

Staffa

7:53 am on Aug 24, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I don't know how familiar you are with 3D modeling and photo realistic rendering but I am and I would suggest that if you can take one or more good photos in a day to stick with photography because it takes days to produce one realistic render.

dpd1

9:23 am on Aug 24, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



That's true... I've done some 3D. But still... I would rather sit in an air-conditioned room for a few days, or work a little each night, than have to load a bunch of crap into a vehicle... Drive out to the location, which always seems to have unbearable heat, or bugs, or clouds, or something... Then set everything up. Then wait for the inevitable wind storm that always manages to show up right after everything is setup... That's assuming that you DO get everything setup, because chances are you forgot some integral part, or tool, or something that prevents the whole thing from going together... Blah blah blah. Giant pain is the a**. I'm also a Photographer, but I've not gotten satisfactory results indoors. And some things are just too big. It's something that just looks best outdoors. I wish to god it WAS jewelry or something that easy, but it's not. In fact, I wish every product I had fit in a small flat-rate box. But oh well... Should have thought of that when I started. :-)

tangor

2:42 pm on Aug 24, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Sounds like what you want is a medium format with digital back and tripod. Not all that much to haul as it also appears you prefer daylight to shoot the object (which sounds pretty fair-size!). If you need shoot at night you'll time lapse instead of flash...

Unique product sales, obviously, and I've said what I as a buyer want to see: a photo, not a rendering.

Staffa

3:58 pm on Aug 24, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Come to think of it, have you considered shooting your products indoors in front of a blue or green screen (or wall) and then chroma key it to a perfect outdoors background ?

Luxoria

7:38 am on Sep 13, 2010 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



When I see a rendered photo or a obvious photoshopped picture of a product I potentially would like to buy for myself I just skip it. However there are times when I purchased items for electronic engineering that I don't mind buying solely from a drawing, but those items are technical and are extremely well documented and not for the average person.

It really really depends on the product. It's kind of hard to guess what the situation could be. I could see buying a greenhouse or a water hand-pump based on a blueprint, but like I stated I am different kind of consumer, I have a good ideal what I am getting into pending documentation.

I don't think it's unethical as long as you can readily tell it's a simulated picture, even then a little disclaimer would be nice and make it seem someone is not trying to be deceiving. But, really, your gut is more than likely correct, get real pictures. If you are concerned about the picture's quality you could leave the simulated pictures as the main pictures and use the real ones as a 'user submitted gallery'.

On one of my websites I had my friends take pictures of sample products I gave them using their own cheapie point and shoot camera's and after touch up the pictures look really good and honest, which they are. Now I have a nice user gallery which makes the products appear more friendly and warm to potential customers.

dpd1

9:44 am on Sep 13, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yeah, the user gallery is a good idea.

The green screen isn't a bad idea either. But by the time I do that, I may as well go outside.