Forum Moderators: buckworks
The ISP hosting the site is unwilling to try a mod rewrite solution, so I'm looking at the static HTML option, but I have a couple of questions.
1. the ISP is concerned that building the static version of the site is a big 'job' for the server, and wants to know how often we'd need to do this strenuous task (after adding new products). I'm thinking 2-3 times a month tops, maybe just once.
The site has about 500 products, so how roughly how long would it take to generate a static version of the site?
I don't see how it could be that much different from rebuilding a large blog in Moveable Type, which I do all the time with my personal ISP.
2. would this cause a duplicate content issue with Google? I just fixed one with this site (URL only listings because pages were too similar). Would there be a way to prevent a duplicate content issue, with robots.txt or something?
3. Anything else I need to know about building a static version? :)
I think it's important to get the page rank circulating around in this site, right now the index, and static pages (privacy.php etc) all have PR 5, and the category and product pages all have PR n/a.
The ISP thinks it's purely a content issue, but up until a month ago, 90% of the pages were URL only listings in google, so...
1. the ISP is concerned that building the static version of the site is a big 'job' for the server, and wants to know how often we'd need to do this strenuous task (after adding new products). I'm thinking 2-3 times a month tops, maybe just once.The site has about 500 products, so how roughly how long would it take to generate a static version of the site?
I have a site with about 100 products and it takes about 3 minutes to produce. I am surprised that the ISP is concerned. Most servers should be able to do this task without any problems.
2. would this cause a duplicate content issue with Google? I just fixed one with this site (URL only listings because pages were too similar). Would there be a way to prevent a duplicate content issue, with robots.txt or something?
Yes it could cause a duplicate content issue. I use a robots.txt to solve this problem.
Damn, the version of X-cart I'm having to use is 3.xx, it doesn't seem too search engine friendly.
If I want to change the title of a category or product, I can't just change the contents of the <title> tag, I have to change the header and the incoming anchor text as well, which to me seems a bit overdone, and limits how many keywords I can get in the <title>.
I'd like to have similar but different anchor text, title and headers.
I'm also a bit concerned about how Google would handle this in general.
The site in question was full of URL only listings, and I fixed that for the owner, but there is still NO PR showing on any of these internal pages, and they rank poorly in the SERPs.
Will making a static version of the site, in essence changing it's structure, be likely to throw the whole site / domain into the Google sandbox?