Forum Moderators: buckworks

Message Too Old, No Replies

Merchant providers

Are outages acceptable

         

Dorian

12:25 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Our merchant provider, BMS, is a major financial institution. That was one of the factors for us when we went into business. It 'promised' to offer us security and show credibility to our customers.

In the last month there have been five outages, totaling 8.3 hours. They have been for various reasons but nothing that I would describe as an emergency. For example, last night their settlement system didn't work so they took the system down for an hour this morning to 'correct problems'.

Do you think its acceptable for an institution like this to ever take their service offline?

too much information

12:38 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well if there was a problem they should take it offline to fix it, at least they did fix it.

One thing you have to think about is that by using their system you are subject to their problems. The only way you are going to get 100% uptime is if you run your own system, but then it's your headache if something goes wrong.

Think about how much work and time they save you by providing their service, and if that doesn't add up to the 8.3 hours, start looking for a replacement.

Dorian

1:08 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well if there was a problem they should take it offline to fix it

It depends what the problem is. Today it was due to the fact that the settlement wasn't working. This shouldn't interupt new transactions as far as I'm concerned.

The only way you are going to get 100% uptime is if you run your own system

My own payment system? Are you serious?

Think about how much work and time they save you by providing their service

No, I'm only thinking how much they're costing me. You make it sound like they're doing me a favour. Their charges are the largest single cost to the company.

What sort of downtime is anyone else experiencing with their merchant provider? What sort of compensation package do they offer?

Tapolyai

2:03 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



What does your Service Level Agreement (SLA) says?

If you don't have one you are up the creek without a paddle.

If you do, you should have memorized it before even signing up with them.

SLAs are the lifeblood of service providers (SP), and your vendor is an SP. IF you didn't get one, there might be some advertising information available that indicates their guaranteed uptime.

Most SLAs provide a recourse for the client to get discounts for future time. i.e. tack on an extra free months, discounted monthly fees, free transactions, etc. See if you can get some of that.

Dorian

3:04 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Tapolyai, thanks for your reply.

However, this isn't about SLA's.

Its actually more a technical question than a practical one and it is this:

Should a major merchant service providor ever be down? If so, under what circumstances?

Corey Bryant

3:20 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Sorry I could not tell if Burlington Merchant Service offered their own gateway or not? If it is their electronic payment that is going down - and you are losing sales, no - that is not acceptable.

Authorizenet.com went down about eight times in the past yeat, while Verisign was down once. LinkPoint did not go down. Depending on your sales, you might consider another electronic payment gateway in conjunction with your current one or you might switch over to another one.

Those 8 hours that you were down is just like closing shop for the day

-Corey

Dorian

4:05 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Corey, yes, BMS (Barclays Merchant Services) is a Payment Service Provider so, when I'm saying the system is going down, I am referring to the gateway service.

As you say, its like shutting shop. Personally I don't think this should ever happen. Its good to hear you're in agreement. I can't understand why companies much larger than ours don't go crazy when this happens.

Corey Bryant

4:20 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



OK - Barclay's - there were two BMSs and I was not too sure which one you were referring to.

But yes - if the gateway is down - no payments can be received so no orders can be placed. It would be the same thing as if you were running a store and the electricity went out. You could not operate your cash register (of course, you could add up the purchases, etc) but nothing else could be done.

There are some other gateways that you might check out. I would contact them and see which ones they are compatible with first and then take a look at those gateways. I know protx was down for awhile last year but a gateway should not do down hardly at all.

-Corey

Tapolyai

7:37 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



However, this isn't about SLA's.

Gotcha.

Six Sigma. I would expect their uptime to be 99.9997%/year. Less then 2 minutes down per year. That is what's expected of major financial systems, telecommunications systems, etc.

Corey Bryant

8:10 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



To come to their defense though, a lot of hackers went down the CISP compliant list of electronic gateways, DDOSed them, asked for money to stop, etc. The FBI (I thought) stopped all of them, but maybe they might just be getting to their services. If it continues though, check out some other electronic gateways. You can still use them for your merchant account processing

-Corey

Dorian

9:57 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



In reality changing service providers isn't that easy and I guess they know that. The interface takes a long time to set up and test (if you going API route) and that's if they even accept you in the first place.

I really just wanted to know if there's any excuse for a major financial institution to have downtime and I agree with Tapolyai, 99.999 percent uptime is about reasonable. I don't want to overly dramatise things but these guys are like the stock exchange. Hundreds of millions are being transacted hourly. I find it quite startling that they think its okay to go offline for eight hours in a month.

Wi11

10:37 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



8.3 hours downtime in a year would be unacceptable for me, let alone a month. I had been considering BMS for my own business, but will think twice now.

Is it Barclay's internet ePDQ you are using?

On a relevant side-note, Barclays online banking seems slow compared to Natwest. Maybe their IT R&D just isn't up to scratch.

incrediBILL

10:55 pm on Mar 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



8.3 hours downtime in a year would be unacceptable for me, let alone a month

Yes, they go down, I've dealt with about 5 of them and everyone has issues now and then, it's unavoidable.

There are 8,760 hours a year so 8 hours a year is nothing as that still puts them at %99.9 uptime for the year.

Even if they are up, there can be internet routing issues that block your server from reaching their site to complete the transaction. I've had routes down at various times between our site and UPS, USPS, payment processor, yada yada, all keeping my site's checkout offline. The more remote sites you interconnect with, the more likely a critical failure can occur. Case in point, I couldn't connect to WebmasterWorld twice yesterday thanks to some AT&T router that was on the fritz.

Dorian

9:35 am on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Is it Barclay's internet ePDQ you are using?

Yes

There are 8,760 hours a year so 8 hours a year is nothing as that still puts them at %99.9 uptime for the year.

Right, but I said they were down 8 hours last month, not last year. There were plenty of outages throughout the year.

there can be internet routing issues that block your server from reaching their site to complete the transaction.

Sure, but that's another issue. In all cases in the last month BMS actually took their server down. And my question was, what is the technical situation which requires a major institution to bring a server down? I've known companies providing important, but not business critical, information to other businesses where there would be an uproar if their server was down more than a few minutes a month.

jagsanger

6:43 am on Mar 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi - we work with over 15 major processors around the world and scores of banks and I can very emphatically state that it is NOT acceptable to have outages at this level.

At the very least you should ask for compensation, retain a merchant advocate to re-negotiate your deal with your bank, or implement a dual bank payment structure that has dynamic load balancing ie: will detect when a gateway is down and send your transactions to another bank.

Banks don't want you to do this, but is compliant and effective (and incidentally keeps them on their toes when it comes to pricing in the future).

regards
Jag

sharbel

4:21 pm on Mar 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



8 hours in a month is a lot. I know when all the DDOS attacks were going on, my one site wasnt able to reliably accept payments for a few days.. it really hurt. Thankfully, the sales generated on that site are subscription based and people just waited a few days to pay. I would have lost a lot of sales if it was just one of the e-commerce sites where people click in from Google to buy something.. they just would have went elsewhere.

Dorian

4:18 pm on Apr 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Sorry, I've been a bit slow to respond because I've been away but here's the update.

Barclaycard Business have advised me that they're within their service level of 98.5% which is what their supplier's guarantee to them. I make that an allowance of around 5.5 days a year. Doesn't that seem like a lot?

They don't have a service level agreement as part of their standard merchant terms and conditions.

Corey Bryant

7:37 pm on Apr 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well it would if it happened all at once or something. Most gateways now are getting two datacenters to help with DDOS attacks and outages

-Corey