Forum Moderators: buckworks
Price comparison sites risk misleading consumers and should be governed by a code of practice, an independent body said on Thursday.The Resolution Foundation, an independent research and policy organisation, said Web sites that compare financial products should sign up to a voluntary code of conduct on accuracy and impartiality.
It would aim to ensure that such services display up-to-date information, disclose how much of the market they cover and are transparent in the commercial relationships they have with product providers.
Price Comparison Sites: Is it Time For a Code of Conduct? [uk.reuters.com]
Why this has happened is beyond me but most any searched item dealing with a product brings up a page full of these sites. As your post indicaes I see I am not the only one seeing mispriced, misleading ads or items to generate a click through. This in itself should ban them by human review.
The general population will one day get sick of the wasted time clicking on these sites and begin to completely ignore them till finally they are not worth a search engines page space and are banned or filtered....Until that time it will only get worse as the cost of doing business on the internet continues to rise...
I'd want the following:
Web sites that compare financial products should sign up to a voluntary code
This is really about PRODUCT comparison sites, not about FINANCIAL products such as investments. Still I think it will instill a false sense of trust that will be abused.
Seals and Codes of Conduct help the unscrupulous which is why so many sleaze firms advertise they are members of the BBB. Pfishing emails are now covered with logos and other devices to defuse healthy distrust.
--
Penny stock scams exist because so many people think that securities MUST be approved by the SEC, which isn't true. (many aren't even audited)