Forum Moderators: buckworks
Another scenario: You charge someone on the last day of their billing cycle, so it appears on the next credit card statement he recieves. Oops, can't fulfil the order, so you issue a refund the next day (but that refund won't show up until the customer's staement the next month). The customer gets his bill and sees the charge, but you told him you're not sending the product. He complains to his credit card company, which issues you a chargeback. So now you're out an additional $10-20 plus the $4.50. Plus you have a chargeback on your record. Too many of those and you're processing rates go up (or you get dropped completely).
Doing a post-authorization - you are only charged a transaction fee. If you you do a sale and then refund, you will be charged transaction fees, and discount rates. This can get pretty expensive.
Plus what happens if you have a large sale and then potentially have to refund it and no money in the bank? This could cause a red flag.
Also keep in mind that pre-authorizations usually only last a couple of days (depending on the issuing bank). And even though the pre-authorization has expired, you can still potentially do a post-authorization / sales via the virtual terminal.
-Corey
Otherwise if you capture before shipping, the credit card companies list this as a reason for a charge back.
[edited by: Peter_Cornstalk at 8:00 am (utc) on Dec. 16, 2006]
The card associations (while they matter) it is up to the issuing bank. Most debit pre-auths will be shorter than a credit pre-auth.
And if the pre-auth has expired, you can go into your virtual terminal usually and finalize the sale. You can run the risk of being denied (if the customer has gone over his / her limit). The sale is not gauranteed like it is with the pre-auth. Of course, if the sale finalizes - the money is yours.
Depending on what the consumer tells the issuing bank will determine the chargeback. A lot of times, it could be time. If you told them it would be there at a certain time and it was not, consumers (depending on the issuing bank) will have grounds for a chargeback
-Corey
I know I can authorize and then capture late
I cant tell from the thread if you're still thinking of doing it this way, but i'd advise against it. Some customers get very irate when they learn they have paid for something up front and then have to wait for a back order. I think this is fair enough too. It means they cant look for a store where they could have received the item faster.