Forum Moderators: buckworks
A for instance...
A customer can order a package of 24 widget for $36.00, but can order a package of 50 widgets for $55.00. The customer orders (2) packages of 24 widgets totaling $72.00...when they could have order the same amount plus two more for $17.00 less. We get a call from the customer claiming to have only gotten one package of 24 instead of two packages.
So, we send another package of 24.
Over the past month I have been "red flagging" these types of orders. Personally take them to shipping to make sure the order is fulfilled correctly.
Guess what?
With almost each and every one of these "red flagged" orders we got a call or email from the customer that they one received one of the 2 or more items ordered.
The final statistics are as follows...
Total red flagged orders: 56
Total claimed not correct by customer: 47
This has been over the past 30 days.
This is a scam that gets around proof of delivery by signature confirmation. It's our word against theirs basically.
Can you tell from the weight of the shipment if 1 or 2 cases were shipped?
That is an idea I have thought of, however if we disagreed with the customer in that we know that we sent the right amount by the shipping receipt weight....how do we use that evidence in a chargeback situation?
Do you use tape were the package can't be opened. We use to get this all the time till we switched tape different from the shipping company. We use a solid paper tape on the bottom covered with a clear tape and put the lable over the box seam.
That is not the case in this situation...we use priority mail boxes and never have a problem with any order whatsoever...and we are talking in the 1000's of packages per month over many years.
My solution to this problem was to install a video camera over the pack table
Again, to make sure it was not the fault of an employee...I watch with my own eyes and even packed most of them myself.
I just had the creepy feeling that this was just a new trick...it's sorta like e-shoplifting.
This is only a recent problem...within the past 3 months or so. It's almost like there must be a website somewhere dealing with the many ways to scam a web merchant or something.
I have to add...
When these customers called the call was given to me to deal with. I explained to the customer that I was overseeing orders which included multiple orders of the same item. Some wanted refunds for the item "not shipped" others wanted more sent. When I insisted the order was packed correctly, the standard response was that they would report us to the BBB, call their credit card company, etc.
We sent the supposely unshipped items anyway and then blocked their CC# so they could not order from us again.
If this continues and starts add up to big dollars, the only thing I can think of is to limit orders to one of each item.
Now when a customer says their order was missing items, I can just go to the video for that day and watch it being packed up. I can also send the video to the customer.
I don't think this would satisfy me if I were a customer who had a problem.
Remember who pays your bills. Your customers are the most important part of your business.
What we did was send one pack of 50 with a note that we have included a few extra at no charge...
We did get one guy ask for a refund on the extra though <boggle>.
And if you do the math, it would make much more sense for somebody to order 2 of the 50-widget packs, claim receipt of only one, and get one "free". That would at least be a more substantial savings (or rip off).
I guess I still can't understand why such a large percentage of you "customers" figured out this angle in the first place.
Now when a customer says their order was missing items, I can just go to the video for that day and watch it being packed up. I can also send the video to the customer.
I don't think this would satisfy me if I were a customer who had a problem.
If you were that customer though, the OP would see that you really had been sent an incomplete order, and they'd send you the rest of the order (with their profuse apologies presumably).
It's if you're the fraudster who's saying that the package was incomplete when it wasn't that video evidence could fox you.
As long as the means of matching the video with the package is foolproof, that is. :)
Best, a.
I guess I still can't understand why such a large percentage of your "customers" figured out this angle in the first place.
For most of us, this "trick" should be a microscopic concern. More often, WE screw up, which is probably the better reason to video the packing process.
would make much more sense for somebody to order 2 of the 50-widget packs, claim receipt of only one, and get one "free".
They do. I was just using the 24 pack as an example.
I guess I still can't understand why such a large percentage of you "customers" figured out this angle in the first place.
It's not a large percentage at all...maybe 1/10 of 1%, but enough to be a pain in the hindquarters with the volume of business we do.
[edited by: oldpro at 6:00 pm (utc) on Nov. 2, 2006]
Remember this is not some distant security camera - the camera sits 5 feet above the pack table and its purpose is to record the order as it is packed.
Have you tried to track back to see if there's any commonality among the orders?
There is a commonality. Today I have gone back through the past 3 months, but still not finished yet, and I have found a glaring clue. Many of these customers have done it before...as much as 4 previous orders. All of the customers stem from one source, but I need to be absolutely sure this is the case.
I'll be back when I am satisfied with my conclusion.
We drop ship our product for Amazon, but this only accounts for less than 5% of our total on-going sales.
Of these "red flagged" orders over 50% of them originally placed their order thru Amazon...then subsequently placed orders directly from our website.
I am thinking these are people who have learned to game Amazon's system...then some or most of the remaining customers are maybe a few that are friends of the Amazon gamers.
On their first order thru Amazon, each and every one of them we had to send another shipment because they claimed to have not gotten all of it. Then they order directly from us and did the same thing again.
Being Amazon represents such a low percentage of our sales and a majority of these rogue customers first learned about us through Amazon...I have to deductivity conclude the common denominator is Amazon.
Many of these customers have done it before...as much as 4 previous orders.
You need to hammer this out now:
* Block those people's future orders (you know that now!)
* Track complaints of missing/faulty items for future reference
* People who order from the specific source - send them two parcels to sign for, they can't easily come back to you to complain
* Perhaps block that source altogether (do you know if these are stolen cards or geniune?)
[edited by: PCInk at 2:11 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2006]
Perhaps block that source altogether (do you know if these are stolen cards or geniune?)
Amazon has recently changed their seller/customer protection policy, this could be because they noticed the system was being gamed like this. Before it weighed heavily in favor of the buyer, now it is a little more difficult for the buyer to get a refund if not warrented.
The only reason we do business with Amazon is because they asked us to participate during the beta phase to move beyond just books.
I can only imagine people ordering 5 books and claiming they only got 2 books. Maybe this is one of the reasons Amazon has so much trouble staying out of the red.
We could drop Amazon altogether, but on the otherhand they have driven many good repeat customers to us. Typically they will originally order from them and then from us direct thereafter. They have their own "cult" following of customers and maybe this trick is something that developed as a result of their customer friendly, no questions asked return policy and heavy emphasis on customer satisfaction.
Whatever the case, we will up our prices on Amazon and ship multiple orders of the same item in separate packages.