Any rules of thumb?
Thanks.
2. There may be some exceptions, where the "e" really makes sense: E-Commerce, E-Business, etc.
3. I haven't read or seen a report of a significant "e" sale in quite some time.
4. EMoney? ECasino? EMortgage? ELoan? EFinance? There's a few, but very, very, few IMHO, that may be worth low $$$$.
5. Your mileage may vary. There's always the chance of love, that someone just has to have what you have. The odds are about the same as winning the trifecta twice in a weekend.
If you had to quantify it - how much value would you say the "e" prefix drains from the name? Let's say hypothetically that its a pretty darn good keyword ... something like "credit" for example. Would "credit" be worth 5 times as much as "eCredit"? Just trying to get an idea.
Thanks for your help.
Ebeer and ewine sound disappointing. Ebay worked somehow,
(what does 'bay' have to do with auctions? Buy At Your-own-risk?)
Ecredit or eloans puts me off, sounds dodgy. Maybe the whole E-thingy is so
stale and overworked that it doesn't have any appeal. E-Larry
Overture+Extension is for the "traffic = value" crowd. There's merit to the model but it doesn't hold up when other factors are a consideration. Not many people typed ELoan into Overture before ELoan took the time and money to brand the domain.
CH - I'd say there's no formula. I'd venture a guess that, on average, the non-e version of a major commercial keyword, is worth 100s to 1000s Xs the value of the e-word. Credit.tld worth $1.5 - 3.0 mil to a motivated and capitalized buyer. ECredit, likely would go for $15-50,000+ on a given day, more if the buyer just had to have it. Then again, the "have to have it buyer" is always a wildcard, so you can't peg your value to that (until such time as you know you've got a good one nibbling).
If they're not "money domains" then the e-domains really lack value. I think in my collection I only have a few, but they're the likes of EBusinessStrategy.tld, EBusinessSchool.tld, EBusinessInfo.com, etc where the "E" makes sense.
I ain't got no ESalad or EShoes domains, though I think somebody did something with EBags, didn't they?
Hey, hope springs eternal, ya know?
Overture+Extension is for the "traffic = value" crowd. There's merit to the model but it doesn't hold up when other factors are a consideration. Not many people typed ELoan into Overture before ELoan took the time and money to brand the domain.
The OV "word.extension" is used for traffic valuations, but the ratio of the OV values without the extension (OV "word" / OV "eword")could give a good indication of how valid the e prefix is in general usage.
Eloan would have no advantage over Xloan or Qloan if you are concerned with absolute overture figures of before and after marketting.
Thanks for all the feedback on the domains!
but as to this thread in particular, it was pretty cool that the appriasal pretty much confirmed what webwork said.