Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.145.44.134

Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

Code 'not physical property'

programming code cannot be stolen under federal law

     

Demaestro

9:33 pm on Apr 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member demaestro is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



[zdnet.com...]

"Because Aleynikov did not 'assume physical control' over anything when he took the source code, and because he did not thereby 'deprive [Goldman] of its use,' Aleynikov did not violate the NSPA."


Interesting.... I always thought that code was the property of the company who had it authored.

His decision does make sense when you consider the charge was essentially for theft. Copyright infringement isn't theft for the same reasons as this isn't but is there no repercussion for what this guy did? Clearly he is morally wrong but is he not legally wrong in some way as well?

Leosghost

9:43 pm on Apr 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member leosghost is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Puts a new slant on reverse engineering, cracking and anti-DRM codes and softwares ..

Marshall

10:12 pm on Apr 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Interesting.... I always thought that code was the property of the company who had it authored.


If you read the definition of "theft" in criminal law books, usually the last sentence ends with something to the effect "thus depriving the owner of its use." This would include theft of property and theft of service. I know this from working in law enforcement. That is why things like movies always have the FBI warning about "protected by copyright whether or not for profit." Making a copy of a disc you bought for your personal use is, again, technically not theft. IMHO, the court made the right decision.

Marshall
 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month