Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from

Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

MPAA Suggests You're Infringing Copyright Just By Embedding Videos

5:07 pm on Apr 11, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

MPAA Suggests You're Infringing Copyright Just By Embedding Videos [arstechnica.com]
The Motion Picture Association of America is squaring off against a coalition of Internet giants and public interest groups over the key question of whether it's possible to directly infringe copyright by embedding an image or video hosted by a third party.

A federal judge took that position last July, prompting a chorus of criticism. Two briefs—one by Google and Facebook, the other by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Knowledge—attacked the decision as contrary to past precedents and potentially disruptive to the Internet economy. They asked the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn it.

Last week, the MPAA joined the fray with a brief in support of Illinois federal judge John F. Grady's ruling. It urged the Seventh Circuit not to draw a legal distinction between hosting content and embedding it. In the MPAA's view, both actions should carry the risk of liability for direct copyright infringement.

12:39 pm on Apr 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

Translation: We can't go after international servers, so let's punish anyone that embeds their content.

Good luck pulling this off if you can't even get YouTube to stop hosting copyrighted music/videos. That's the source of the vast majority of embedding anyways.
5:45 pm on Apr 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator webwork is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

URLs, as outbound links (OBLs), are arguably static but the contents of the files the OBLs reference or the destination site's URL structure itself may not be static. For example, a webmaster can swap images "in a file" (URL) while maintaining the same URL/file name.

That being the case must all websites, at the risk of being sued if some change is made to the externally hosted image, now continuously monitor all externally hosted images and videos?

I would say yes if liability can attach merely by virtue of linking to an image at its source.

What if the URL "goes bad" (file deleted, corrupted, renamed, etc.) and the external system redirects to a new image? I get dinged/sued if the new redirected image/video file has copyright problems?
3:09 am on Apr 17, 2012 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member

If you in anyway profit from it, even if by virtue of traffic, you should be held liable. Good for the MPAA. Tough rough for the rest.
5:54 pm on May 6, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

And the MPAA is wrong as they are wrong on virtually everything regarding copyrights usually.