Forum Moderators: not2easy
I've seen several other websites using Flickr images, but the way they give attribution to Flickr seems to differ. Some sites host the image on their server and credit Flickr by linking to either the image itself on Flickr or the image creator's Flickr profile. I've seen other sites just hotlink a Flickr hosted image and link back to Flickr. I'm wondering what are the specific rules on this and the generally accepted creative commons code of conduct sort of thing? I tried digging through Flickr's help pages but got nowhere. Anyone who knows about this please reply!
Thank you...i pity the fool - MisterT
[edited by: Beagle at 2:26 am (utc) on Feb. 15, 2008]
FYI, if anyone wants to find images on Flickr with a Creative Commons license: flickr.com/creativecommons
There are several license types, so make sure you abide by the specific rules of each.
I've done some more research and there does not seem to be specific rules regarding attribution, but the attribution should basically be as prominent as it is in the original work. For Flickr, it seems usually a link back to the user's Flickr page is enough.
Anyway, if anyone is interested in this the best thing to do is read the license details at creativecommons.org
1) Any uploader can assign a CC licence to his images regardless of him having the actual rights to do so. In other words: if some moron uploads a photo from Getty and assigns a CC licence, and you download and use this photo, then you are in big trouble.
2) On Flickr, the uploader can change the licence at any point in time, also from CC to copyright protected. This makes you (as a user of the photo) vulnerable to copyright infringement claims by this photographer, putting the burden of proof (that you rightfully used the CC licence) on your shoulders.
So, I'd stay as far away as possible when using CC licences.