Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

Content Management Systems

Do you use it? Offer it to clients? What worked for you?

         

martinibuster

2:49 am on Aug 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I recently installed moveabletype for a client so that they could self-manage a "News" page without webmaster intervention. Works fine, despite a couple incidents of weirdness. But I won't uncross my fingers until a couple months of trouble free operation have passed.

I'm interested in using CMS to generate templated pages for a Special Interest web site. Any recommendations?

What experience have you had with CMS? What do you recommend? What do you NOT recommend?

Thanks for your input!

Knowles

2:59 am on Aug 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I find CMS systems to be a good thing as long as they are made right. Do not give them to much control. Allow them to post new news items but not change the look of the site or anything like that. I have yet to find a pre made CMS site that will fit needs of everyone. I find its easy to work towards building your own.

PeterD

3:34 am on Aug 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



If you're going to maintain the special interest site yourself rather than designing it and then turning it over to someone else, you might want to look into CityDesk. It's a very lightweight CMS for Windows (only) that runs off an Access db. Everything runs on your desktop. It generates static HTML pages using your templates and a simple (maybe a bit too simple) scripting language, then synchs the database with the server by FTP. I've been using it since December with one of my sites, and it's worked great--very solid. You can get a nice clean site together really fast with CityDesk.

If you are designing the site, then turning it over to somebody else, though, it might not be the best thing, because there's no way to lock down the scripts and the templates. The other potential downside is that it currently pretty much only does HTML 4.01 transitional.

(I have no affiliation with CityDesk.)

martinibuster

3:49 am on Aug 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



CityDesk sounds interesting. I'll investigate that. Anyone else use CMS to generate new web pages?

shelleycat

5:06 am on Aug 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Like a lot of other people I use greymatter to run a couple of blogs. Unoriginal I know. However I think it has the flexibiity to be used for creating other types of websites also. The reason why I think this is the three types of pages it generates:
  • main page - lists a certain number of entries newest first - this is the traditional "blog" part
  • entry pages - a single static html page for each entry - this is the part which could be emphasised to create your content pages
  • archive pages - both a main archive list keeping track of all your pages and either monthly or weekly archives which are a conglomerate of all entry pages for that time - this area is reasonably flexible and you can turn off the weekly/monthly parts

Each of these sections can be given completely different templates and there is a lot of control over which variables are used where (GM's strong point in my opinion). For example the main page could be reduced to a simple table of contents by the use of the "extended entry" option ie where part of the text is only seen on the individual entry page. Or you could put the archive list on the main page giving a site map/table of contents that way

Most blogs just use the entry pages for comments and some don't even add formatting. However I can imagine a site where these are actually the important part, templated content pages rather than just sequential entries. They are already spidered and indexed by search engines as seperate pages.

It's possible to add users who can post and edit their own entries but don't have access to anything else (so the templates, config etc are safe). GM is installed on your server and uses perl.

There are some downsides, not surprising considering it's free. Greymatter does have the occasional odd bug from looking at their support forum and the forum is the only support available. However it's been around for ages so many of the bugs are known along with workarounds for them.

GM isn't as powerful as other CMS, particularly the professional ones, because it's not designed to be. For example MT has many features greymatter doesn't, eg the use of mysql and php, built in rss feeds, trackback. However GM does it's intended job well.

Filipe

10:41 pm on Sep 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have yet to find a pre made CMS site that will fit needs of everyone. I find its easy to work towards building your own.

I agree wholeheartedly. If you can do it on your own, or find someone to do it for you, creating your own content management system is best. Not only will it be faster because the database system will be customized to what your site alone needs (rather than adding extra fields and tables to accomodate the largest breadth of sites possible as an out-of-the-box CMS would) but it would run exactly how you want it to and you would know it in-and-out.

martinibuster

11:39 pm on Sep 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



GreyMatter seems interesting because what I want to do is have a templated page where I can drop the content and pics within the designated table cells and drop advertisements in their own TD's.

I envision the content being managed by the CMS and the advertisements being coded in sitewide into the main template and/or rotating some banners with JavaScript, although I'd prefer to stay away from banners.

Darn, I've got some research to do...

Filipe

12:20 am on Sep 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Check out this thread:

[webmasterworld.com...]

shelleycat

2:11 am on Sep 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GreyMatter seems interesting because what I want to do is have a templated page where I can drop the content and pics within the designated table cells and drop advertisements in their own TD's.

You could definitely do this with greymatter. It would take a bit of lateral thought about how to get the different sections to work together, ie remove the emphasis from the main page to the entry pages, but that's probably a given anyway.

I envision the content being managed by the CMS and the advertisements being coded in sitewide into the main template and/or rotating some banners with JavaScript, although I'd prefer to stay away from banners.

You can use custom viables to add the same peice of code to various pages, meaning you only need to edit it in one place and it updates on all the pages where that variable is. This would make it easy to include advertising or whatever on lots of pages and be able to update it easily. It makes more sense when you see how the variables work.

I would definitely suggest a bit of time reading the support firums though because as I said before, some people have found some weird problems with it. Personally I've found it very stable but I only have about 120 pages so far.

martinibuster

2:34 am on Sep 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



shelleycat,

120 pages is a lot of pages, that's sounds pretty stable.

shelleycat

2:46 am on Sep 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



120 pages is a lot of pages, that's sounds pretty stable.

It's not a lot actually, only about three months worth. Of course I always was talkative ;)

There are people in the forum who advocate archiving the old pages and reinstalling at least once a year because GM gets slower to rebuild all the files the more pages you have. Also many people use SSI to lower the size of each page and thus the load on their server. This is important for two reasons:
a) some people have problems with using lots of server resources while rebuilding when their page count gets high (although that is often more to do with the server set up than GM).
b) if something stops GM while it's rebuilding (ie a server timeout) it can corrupt the files again causing server problems. This happened to me when I was installing GM for the first time but is apparently pretty rare.

I think the slow down starts when you get to 500+ pages but I can't remember exact numbers. My entry pages are fairly small with only one graphic so 120 only takes about 20 seconds to rebuild even with my slow dialup connection. Also my entire site is still less than 2MB so far, GM files and all.

But then I guess when you think what it's built for, ie websites which are added to every day, what GM considers a normal page count others might find high :)

Shelley