Forum Moderators: rogerd

Message Too Old, No Replies

posting in a free forum

         

aj100

1:34 pm on May 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



A forum I belong to has decided to go to a pay system for membership. This to me is fine the owner needs to make money or close it. It originally started as a free forum and has a considerable amount of posts by professional business members and has been doing so for several years.
The owner of the forum plans on making all the content that was posted on the free fourm only available to paying members now instead.

So, my question, is the content that has been posted to the free forum by members belong to the owner of the forum to charge admission to access those posts?

The owner has in the terms of service that all posts become the property of website.

What are your thoughts about this?
What are the legal aspects?
Any pitfalls with this?

Is it legal for the owner to collect these postings made by people that was under a free forum close the free access and offer the content that he has collected over time available only to paying members?

Is there some where I could find an answer to this?

If this is ok to do it would be a great way to populate a site with content and switch to a pay system to allow access.
Thanks
aj

stapel

4:19 pm on May 9, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It sounds like you're wanting to get paid for your old posts or something....

The Terms of Use for the site/forum specifically said that all posts become the property of the site. I see no legal problems with the site owner deciding how his content is going to be accessed.

Whether a sufficient number of users switch to paid access, or the site dwindles to nothing, is an entirely different issue.

Eliz.

aj100

1:17 pm on May 10, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




Eliz; no I'm not looking to get paid for my posts.

Just like this forum the posts like yours was given freely in the pursuit of comradery in a community. I could join the paid area here, just as easily, I chose not to at this time. You're obviously perusing the free forum also, and I thank you for your response it is the only one so far, and maybe its a mute issue.

It would be the same here, the owner/owners could assimilate all the posts added by you and everyone else freely in the past years in community spirit and take them private for pay viewing only. Possibly that is how it is done here, I dont know.
It would then be ok for them to charge you to access freely given information to your posts from years earlier. Had the forum had been a paid membership from the begining I could understand it, I do understand the need to make a forum profitable, if that is the desire

Im new to this, however, I have been working on my own site which needs to be profitable and this would be another avenue for revenue.

You read you do you learn.

I also understand the tickler of the free forum and then migration to the paid area to access more professional answers.

But, just like the first part of your response, had I been a member paying for a subscription here,I would have to rethink my next monetary contribution.

Thank you
aj

seamus

4:48 pm on May 10, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just a thought,
If visitor a slanders visitor b on your forum and you refuse to remove the post for visitor b, visitor b will probably sue you. Now who owns the post?

treeline

5:39 pm on May 10, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It had better be one heckuva forum to keep going, because it won't show up in search engines anymore, so bringing in new members will be very difficult. Slip sliding away....

Beagle

3:41 pm on May 14, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



In the US, at least, it's very unlikely that a forum can rightly claim actual ownership of the posts. That would need a transfer of copyright, which in the US requires a signature by the person transferring the copyright (in this case, the poster). That is, a physical, ink on paper signature - clicking on an "I agree to terms" button doesn't do it. Although I'll make the required suggestion to check with an attorney for sure, this requirement is pretty clear because it's in a written statute (again, within the US); it's not something that's been decided in court by case law.

It's probably also important to note that a creative work is copyrighted automatically as soon as it's in "fixed form" - which has been defined to include publishing on the web. So unless the site owner has contracted with the posters to prepare "works for hire" for which they're getting paid (now there's an idea ;) ), the creator/author/poster does hold copyright.

What is likely, is that by posting in the forum someone grants a license to the forum to use their writing. The TOS should spell out exactly what's included in that license, including how the posts can be used. This is how WWW operates, I'm sure. If you're thinking about using this form of monitization, you should work with an attorney so your TOS do what you want them to.

For any of this outside the US, definitely check with an attorney who knows the law in that country.

aj100

5:14 am on May 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Beagle
you bring up some interesting topics. do you know where this can be found. I posted a similar question on the free law forum one attorney had said there is no problem as he sees it the only TOS is

Post Ownership

All posts become the property of *company name* at the time of posting.

thats it no submit acceptance
does it sound like it will hold up?

merlin23

5:57 am on May 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This is an ongoing issue - has been for years!

I was a member of a free posting, sports forum, with many knowledgeable posters posting systems and analysis which had in some cases taken years to develop...

The forum administrator also decided to switch to a paying forum....naturally there was uproar...

In the end admin decided against the paying route....

Anyway..back on topic...what strikes me, is that the TOS thingy , if challenged in court is weak (in my opinion)...

And another point....if when a poster posts on a free forum....if this post now belongs to the admin/owner of the site....why do most forums...allow an edit and a delete post facility.......?

Beagle

12:12 am on May 22, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



...do you know where this can be found?

Try this, especially sections 201(c) and 204:
[copyright.gov...]

If you look at the TOS of some well-known, well-run forums, I doubt if you'll find too many of them claiming ownership of the individual posts. Section 201(c) above points out the difference between that and ownership of the "collected work".

aj100

5:34 am on May 23, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi Beagle, thank you for the link.very interesting reading. If Im reading correctly then even having a T.O.S. that states

Post Ownership

All posts become the property of XXXXXX.#*$! at the time of posting.

This is all that is listed at the site for a TOS. Kind of kills my idea of following his lead on esigning a site that format. Maybe a free area and a premium area also. I see it woking on another site I visit.
Thank you
aj