Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from

Forum Moderators: rogerd

Message Too Old, No Replies

Why Doesn't Twitter have its own URL Shortener?

Like Bit.ly

9:30 pm on Sep 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 11, 2005
posts: 127
votes: 0

We have all heard about URL shorteners and how vital they are to the Twitter ecosystem. If they are, then why doesn't Twitter have its own URL shortening system? why does it have to rely on bit.ly and other services to do this? what if they go under or get bought by a spam company and convert every URL to spam or worse yet, to #*$!?

Just curious and appreciate any feedback.

Thank you,

11:43 am on Sept 21, 2009 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
votes: 685

I guess because they are a microblogging service and not a url shortening company. However, it decided, some while back, to align itself to bit.ly.
3:26 am on Sept 28, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 20, 2002
votes: 0

Seems to me although they use bit.ly, they realize that URL shorteners may not be the best long-term solution. I'm not a database person, so I don't know the storage implications - but it seems like shorteners will ultimately mess with search results. I want to know where a link is coming from (although I have no idea how prevalent this opinion is).