Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 35.170.81.210
Forum Moderators: rogerd
Facebook has sold a 1.96% stake for $200m (£126m) to a Russian internet firm, a move that values the social networking website at $10bn.
[news.bbc.co.uk...]
On the other hand, FB seems unstoppable in building membership and traffic, so presumably economic viability can happen once they are part of everyone's Internet plumbing.
DST's internet businesses account for more than 70% of all page views on Russian language websites.
That's pure gibberish in my opinion: the Russian language web is a wild and large set of sites, and unless they mean that they have small percentages of pretty much all big Russian sites (in which case they can't really say "DST's internet businesses..").
Also, they just lost $200m, because 1.96% of 0 dividend is still 0 ;)
lol I JUST told my colleague the same thing. They aren't profitable and they don't pay dividends. Bigger isn't always better, right Enron, Worldcom... ? I'm more profitable than Facebook!
joined:Jan 3, 2003
posts:1023
votes: 0
The third director of DST worked in London and for Goldman Sachs.
So my conclusion is - DTS is not "russian" firm. It is a western firm with russian directors (who focus on russian market), and with western money.
[ceoworld.biz...]
There are some idiots out there.
They sell lots of ads, so why arn't they making money? They don't need many staff I imagine. Its all on automatic !
So how is anyone else supposed to make money on the web ?
Whoever "gave" them 200 million is a moron. Unless Facebook starts to charge users, they'll never make the money they need without dumb people "investing" in them.
joined:Jan 3, 2003
posts:1023
votes: 0
Who's the most valuable advertising segment?
Children, closely followed by students.
Who's going to get credit cards? 401Ks? bank accounts? rent new apartment? pay outrageous education fees for practically worthless US college degree? who's buying pizzas, burgers, soda, computers, newest cellphones and newest clothing fads doing all that? who needs to be conditioned into a dumb, metrosexual consumer?
And then there's this invaluable info you are providing YOURSELVES to law enforcement and other goverment spies.
Facebook is INVALUABLE.
Would that be because of their high disposable incomes?
Anyone I know who has advertised on FB has concluded that it is an utter waste of money, unless your offering happens to be free or very nearly free.
FB = kids with no money. Ditto Myspace and all the other "me too" social networks.
joined:Jan 3, 2003
posts:1023
votes: 0
One of top 3 largest TV channels by ad revenue? Nickelodeon (kids), $1.6 bln ad revenue, and MTV $1.1 Bln.. Looks like larger is only one channel - ESPN with $3.7 bln. That is what you call "kids with no money".
Social networks are the best place for any kind of social engineering - we are talking about future consumers, future voters etc.
And while searching for that info, it was the first time in my practice that I couldn't find anything on Google and found it on the first page on Bing.com.
Yeah but they are tv channels that advertise products such as chippies and candy etc, so that kids can nag their mums when they get to the supermarket.
Kids are not going to click on more serious pay per click ads that companies such as mine want to put up.
As I mentioned earlier, some just don't get it.
google should have tried to buy at least a stake ..they could have had everything sewn up for years to come ..that would have been all the data on everyone as they got older ..but they didn't buy in and now it's too late for them ..microsoft also missed that one ..I'm not surprised at all that a Russian company bought in ..the country is( as are many other ex soviet republics ) awash with highly skilled IT people ..If more people spent some time on Russian and other ex Eastern block sites ..or even Arab language sites they would be amazed at the levels of expertise ..and also the lack of "it's only of use if it can make me money right now " mentality ..the long view and what is needed to get there is something that very few in the west "get" ..
Nick is number 9 on the list I just found. And I suspect a great deal of that is for XMas gifts...