Forum Moderators: rogerd
Net hoax turns deadly, turns town against neighbors [chicagotribune.com]
This raises a couple of issues for operators of community sites and social networks:
1) Anonymity is greatly valued in many communities because it allows frank discussion without exposing personal information, but will communities end up having to establish the real identity of users even if they keep it confidential? Even then, a hoax like the one that precipitated the above tragedy could still be perpetrated.
2) As a community operator, how do you deal with members who are in emotional distress? Just about every busy community encounters this situation once in a while. A member is clearly troubled, and is posting in a way that makes other members uncomfortable and/or worried... it seems kind of cruel to add to the problem member's troubles by issuing warnings or turning off posting, but something has to be done. How have you handled these issues?
...
Anonymity isn't limited to community sites. This could have happened on IRC, flickr, through MSN or any other chat interface all the same.
I felt awfully sorry for the girl, but with all due respect to the mother, a girl of this age being so insecure, so vulnerable... in my offline experience more often than not originates from how parents behave at home, and not the (online) community.
Operators, members usually help a huge deal in keeping one's spirits up... actually the net eases a lot of angst among such troubled people, and the ease of turning off the computer / logging off a network makes it even more inviting. You can come and go, start a new 'life' whenever you please.
And I don't mean the one who set up the hoax, but the girl.
Operators can't do anything, just by operating the site they helped a fair deal already.
I read a comment from her mother, a quote to be exact. Didn't sound too sensitive. If it wasn't for community sites the girl might have committed suicide even sooner than she did. Usually such people, either young or middle aged, are more curious of afterlife than what's left from their days as humans. 'Prepared to die'... so to speak.
Either way the whole story is horrible, but I'd investigate the parents and the neighbors, and file pretty serious suits against them... before I'd issue the threat of online anonymity.
The story made me raise an eyebrow to say the least.
The ones at fault were sitting within a few hundred feet from her.
Mistreated her for years. As an operator, you just can't beat people who plan this kind of abuse.
And I really don't think most of the ( otherwise high percentage ) of troubled people on the net'd have taken this 'boy' so seriously. I'm having doubts about the girl doing so too.
In this case, an ADULT, along with their children plotted this to get back at a child who had been unkind. The child ended up committing suicide.
There is no way any company, internet based or otherwise, could have protected the parties involed (although the girl who committed suicide was underage when she signed up for the account but the difference of a year would not have affected the outcome of this).
In this case an adult did a very stupid thing, which seems to me is no different than an adult showing up to (physically) fight their children's bullies.
There should be laws in place to deal with this. Then again, there should be adults who are willing to act like adults. But, I suppose, at their essence, that is what laws are there to enforce.
[Decided to edit - replace **** with the word of your choice.]
I worry more about those members in forums who exhibit behavior that indicates some kind of emotional problem. Usually other members are helpful, but often the troubled members can place a heavy load on other members and moderators. And, it's important that they seek real professional help and not rely on other anonymous forum posters to diagnose their problems.
I tend to cut things off when they get disruptive, and encourage the member to seek in-person help.
If I say that you're ugly as sin, and you kill yourself, am I murderer?
I've read the articles before on CNN and elsewhere, and don't remember anyone 'blaming' myspace.
If the shootings by mistreated, bullied, mentally unstable boys this year didn't send the proper message already. But these things can't be stressed enough... you shouldn't treat people badly, and that's that. Not your neighbor, nor your classmate, not even your 'enemies'.
...
Can't remember seeing the story of the finnish boy here, ( perhaps I missed it ) who actually laid out the plans of killing others before killing himself, and then did exactly so, last week I think - he posted straightforward clues on YouTube, from where the operators have deleted these videos afterwards. Not sure if he did so to leave a trace for others, or to himself, so that someone might be able to stop him. Not sure if YouTube contacted the local police before the incident, or whether they knew whom to contact at all, but... regardless of these steps taken or not taken, the problems leading there were that some people treated a not-so-healthy person badly, who then snapped.
People just shouldn't do such things.
And that stress then wouldn't burst out in such tragedies.
...
OK, if she was mean or had a "falling out" with their daughter that is something that MATURE adults need to take up with each other it is obvious the parents who did this are far from mature.
The parents of the deceased do have the right to a wrongful dealt suit (IMO) and the chats / emails / blogs between the deceased and the "jokers" need to be looked though with a microscope, I'm sure something was done that could be considered illegal.
As for the WW title on the splash page, I do think it is misleading. It implies that MySpace is at fault when they're not and it seems that no one is making that claim, just that sites like this need to be policed (which is very difficult to do).
(She) stated she, her daughter and (the temporary employee) all typed, read and monitored the communication between the fake male profile and Megan …..
Having an additional temporary employee handling the fake myspace account shows how immature she is.
Does MySpace terms and conditions say anything against creating a fake account?
The above comments may seem heartless, but I do fill their pain. I just believe that what they did wasn't illegal and that they shouldn't be held responsible anymore then the girl's parents, the girl, or anyone else envolved (such as myspace).
1) If you yell "fire" in a theater and I am trampled to death in the stampede.
2) If you make threatening phone calls every night to my house, and I suffer emotional distress, health problems, etc.
I think the legal system is sorting out how to deal with behavior by young people, often with odd results. It used to be more or less accepted that students would bully other students, or make cruel remarks. Now, such behavior may result in disciplinary action or occasionally legal action, particularly if the behavior is related to a protected category (gender, minority, etc.). Trying to control all behavior by kids can get carried to extremes, of course - there was just a story about a young student who hugged a classmate and got suspended [wjbc.com].
The dilemma seems to be that authorities try to devise rules that will prevent problem behavior but have difficulty enforcing them without tripping up similar but benign behavior.
That a presumably responsible adult was involved in the hoax and harrassment makes this situation stranger than most.
But, back to the community issue: have you had to deal with emotionally disturbed members who you worried might present a danger to themselves or others?
I am surprised that the parents, who knew their daughter was emotionally unstable would let her online unsupervised. They would never let her hang out at a bar unsupervised but they let her troll the net without a second thought? Any emotionally stable (relative term) teen would have fired back or ignored threatening language. The other party could not know that being mean would lead to a death.
Websites don't pull hoaxes on people. People pull hoaxes on people.
The kid and his parent who did this to her should get what is coming to them, but if had they done this VIA their Hotmail account rather then MySpace would this have implications for Email? No, and it shouldn't have implications for the networking community either.
You can't stop bad people from being bad. They find a way to do it if they want to bad enough.
But there was no body lying in a pool of blood. No weapon in {name removed by Walkman} hand. The call was a prank, one of many at the {name removed by Walkman} home this year. A lawn job. A brick through a window. Threatening phone calls. Paintball attacks.
The neighborhood is angry."
[stltoday.com...]
Additionally bloggers have splashed their name all over and many are urging a boycott of their business.
We all have to deal with jerks in this world, so trying to lay blame on the other parents, stupid and mean as they were is pointless. School kids harrassing each other seems to be common place these days, not surprising if they have parents like the ones that pretended to be Josh.
A man, they were told, had been fatally shot inside a home.
Neighbors opened doors, peered out windows and watched. As many as 15 deputies, they said, drew weapons and charged the home of Lori and Curt Drew.
Then you have someone calling the cops saying someone was shot in the other parents home, just to harass them and you have to wonder how many other people were put at risk while the police were wasting their time with a false alarm.
There were no doubt many mistakes made all around, a series of events that led to the childs suicide, not entirely the fault of any one stupid person.
No criminal charges will be filed against people who sent cruel Internet messages to a 13-year-old girl before she committed suicide, the St. Charles County prosecutor said Monday.The parents of Megan Meier of Dardenne Prairie, who hanged herself last year, said her suicide came minutes after she received mean messages through the social networking site MySpace.