Forum Moderators: open
G
Being curious, I looked and was fascinated to find this:
All Categories > Property and Business Services > Business Services > Other Business Services > Computer Bulletin Board Services
All Locations, VIC, Melbourne - City
There seemed to be hundreds of bulletin board services in every suburb of Melbourne! When I got to the lowest level, they looked like computer shops! If these shops have paid to be here, I doubt if anyone will see the listings.
This space will get very compeditive as the two giants finally wake up and start building some more dynamic sites that bridge the gap between USER and CONTENT.
Watch for some Web 2.0 ish sites to be launched by the big players in Aus soon
*winks at ya*
Both SE's need to seriously address the players that are gaming the system (hehe, what's new), they are not that hard to identify and it's a shame they can't catch them with the algo's.
I really think the main issue is they have not really looked at the inbounds correctly and consider anything vagely ontopic as an equal vote. If they took a step back and analysed the quality of the inbounds a little more, the results would be much cleaner.
To me it seems like quality .gov .edu and even legit .org links are not given as much weight in MSN and Yahoo, either that or the 'fresh' factor overrides old links. It's a shame as most of what I would consider to be authourities tank out badly. They could also be getting lost in an attempt to include resorts and hotels etc. in the SERPS.
Either way they are a little behind G, but def ahead in other areas. I have noticed MSN is very good at finding smaller resorts and including them on bigger serps rather than the 'thin affiliates' that generally clutter the results ;)
(Not that thin affiliates aren't cool ;-P)