Forum Moderators: DixonJones
I have searched Webmasterworld on this subject and read this thread:
[webmasterworld.com...]
I thought it would be great to update the situation. It seems a lot has changed in this market.
What would be the best choice for a webmaster who want to analyse the logs of several customer's websites?
Would it be best to download their logs and analyse them locally? What would be the best choice(s) today?
--
Alexey Stcherbic
[edited by: engine at 7:25 am (utc) on Aug. 23, 2002]
[edited by: mark_roach at 7:43 pm (utc) on Aug. 24, 2002]
pageone - Do you mean "domains" rather than "URLs"? I can see where if it's domains, it might be an attractive option to offer to small clients.
Any advise for someone wanting to track hits to pages on a retail site. We are not wanting to create reports for clients... we want to create reports for our own selves which will help us to determine what advertising brings people to our site who actually buy.
Also, to see which search engines are bringing people to our site who actually buy.
There is a possibility we could put software on our server.
Ideally looking for something, that whether hard or easy to set up, After is was set up, would work semi-automatically if not automatically.
We would be working with 3-6 of our sites.
To summarize: main goal is to track those who actually buy.
Thank you,
Stephen Wick
They do not monitor Robot crawling which is a shame.
In recent months I've been testing Summary and have become pretty attached to it. It has a lot of customizable features and a ton of pre-configured reports that are downloadle in text or spreadsheet form. They also have one of the best online tutorials I've seen on web analytics. I haven't been able to get clearance to install it on any of my clients' hosting accounts, so I can't speak to performance on a server, but as an analysis tool for downloaded logs I really like it. Speed is pretty decent too.
Due to feedback at WebmasterWorld I'm also giving FastStats a try. Still trying to sort out their approach to filter includes/excludes and I'm still waiting to see the "fast" part. DNS lookups have been running for several hours (as I speak), but I'm assuming that's something that's cached for future reports. I did some tests on just a day's worth of logs and I think I may have found a good blend of qualities that I can use for client reporting but still have most of the 'at-a-glance' data that's important to me. For more depth and customization, Summary will fill most of my other needs.
A neat FastStats feature that I haven't seen mentioned above is Tree View. It's an interactive graphical display where, for any specific page, it shows referring pages and next pages visited, with percentages and special alerts on things like frequent exits.
DNS lookups have been running for several hours
Yes, the DNS lookups really slow FastStats down - and any other analyzer as well. FastStats uses a multi-threaded DNS lookup and it can be resolving up to 64 IP addresses at one time. But it's still time intensive - after all, it's using the net.
Most of the time I don't need DNS information. Without the added time for DNS lookup, FastStats reports run mighty fast for me - averaging around 4 minutes to crunch 1 GB of standard Apache files.
Good to know!
I can get along without the DNS lookups 'most' of the time but I just got used to having them, and they run pretty fast after the initial run in Summary. Is that the case with FastStats too?
In the dept. of boneheaded blunders: I highly recommend making sure the filters and settings are working BEFORE you run with DNS lookups on. I ran afoul of the AND vs OR settings mentioned earlier...and several hours later...I had nada.
Perhaps I am just being stupid and haven't paid out for the all singing, all dancing version or just do not know how to configure it properly to achieve basic ROI info? :)
P.S. I am not a programmer.
There was a link to Analog's documentation above, read that.
