Forum Moderators: DixonJones
When Webtrends finisehd the sites came back up
I didn't think webtrends could do this until having a chat with the guys from Netracker and they mentioned that Netracker could go and parse all the URL's to get the page titles.
That made me sit up - I noticed that Webtrends had the page titles of my pages in it too.
When I think back to last night I noticed that it was the databases that had gone down rather than the sites (though the loading times were horrific even for the html pages).
Could Webtrends have overloaded my database/s last night when it was loading and parsing the pages for the titles from the pages? Especially if it was hitting the database with database requests for all the database URL's.
If it did then "jeeze" it could have warned me! I get around 3000 UV's a day and on average they probably hit the database/s around 3-5 times each - so say 15,000 a day x 30 days = 450,000 calls to the database each month. Would webtrends have tried to do this itself over the 1.5 hours it was building the analytics database? If so, then I'm not surprised my sites went down
Any thoughts would be good on whether this could have been the cause and if so, can I stop it?
Thanks
You can avoid the whole thing 2 ways: don't turn on "Retrieve HTML Titles," or you can supply WT with a "your site's domain" string that's either nonexistent or empty. But either way, once it has its cache of titles built, it won't bother your db again until the cache fills up or expires.
You can also see the WT activity by opening your logs; I think "WebTrends" will be in the User Agent field.
I agree that WT (and all such programs) should present a clear warning about this. In my experience, the load only lasts a very few minutes, but sometimes the sys admins get a little wigged out if they notice it going on. I haven't experienced it bringing down a database but that probably depends on configuration issues.
WT was run on a dedicated PC (actually the PC where LogAnalyzer 8 resided was refused due to not meeting the specs - the new PC cost me 5x more than the upgrade of WT), while Apache run on a different machine. The logs were on the Apache machine. I use a CMS which relies on a MySQL database.