Forum Moderators: phranque
1) Topic I enjy a lot, would be easy to write content every day, but there aren't a ton of advertisers for this, the main keywords feature 10-50 advertisers. Also, the PPC is only about 3-10c avg. (estimate)
2) Topic I have not much interest in, barely at all. Writing content would mean doing alot of reasearch before writing articles, but the PPC is 1.00-2.00 (I know)
What would you go with? Also, topic 1 is alot less competitive.
Derek
The only problem I can see with what you describe,is that I would probably spend all my time building these "support systems" --I find programming more interesting than writing... :-)
BTW, I personally go with niches that have *decent* PPC/traffic and that I find *somewhat* interesting --and I outsource the actual writing! ;-)
Someone will make money out of catalogueing cuddly toy manufacturers. It's not me, but someone will love it and I bet people will read it too. The money in any business comes out of adding value and providing a better "thing" than the next guy. If you like it, others will like it.
I once heard a Swedish Economics professor before the days of the web talk about a niche... a "Foot Fetishist" magazine... EXTREMELY niche market as he described it. Only 3 people in Birmingham... seven in London, 9 in Paris... Add them together around the world and they had a profitable magazine.
Choose your niche and be the best in the world at it. Google wants the best in teh world at the top of the list - not the height of mediocrity. You can't be the best in the world with property without a great plan and substantial resources. You MIGHT get to the top of the G-list, but only by crook, not by hook.
Ron is right. What is in your head affects your productivity. Do something that won't mess with your head.
Dixon.
P.S. if the bids are $2.00 then it's not THAT niche is it?
I intend to launch with a 100 pages. Should I wait for Google to index the site before I place adverts on it, and should I stay away from affiliates - ie, just use Google and Overture?
How does one go about finding such a writer? What is a good measurement for "original content"? Many writers will simply summarize content that is already on the web. Does this count as original? Is the key to find creative writers who can come up with new ideas, or is it fine to find writers who just rewrite and reorganize pre-existing content?
(geckofuel - You'd be more likely to get feedback on your specific question in the "Content, Writing and Copyright" forum.)
Long story short, I've ended up paying double what I felt was a "reasonable price" when paying hourly, and I'm no miser. I understand and appreciate thorough research and good writing.
If the per-page rate is reasonable, most writers will agree to it and more often than not their articles will require very little editing.
off course, if you have some kind of idea on how to make money doing absolutely nothing.. and I mean nothing.. please let me know!