Forum Moderators: phranque
The commonwealth of Massachusetts has proposed a plan to phase out office productivity applications from Microsoft and other providers in favor of those based on "open" standards, including the recently approved OpenDocument standard.
"The importance here is more symbolic than anything, of course. While Massachusetts is undoubtedly a sizable contract for Microsoft, the revenue is incidental to the big picture: a sizable win in the US for the ODF (OpenDocument Format),"
OpenOffice got some attention in the article; should be interesting to see if this decision in Massachussets has any kind of impact on the general public when it comes to open source software.
To me, the question isn't why would a governmental body of any type do this, but rather, how could they possibly not do it if the public longterm good is supposed to be a consideration?
They are happy to keep PDF files - I'm lost for words.
PDF is an open format - [en.wikipedia.org...]
PDF is a subset of those PostScript language elements that define the graphics, and only requires a very simple interpreter.
My astonishment with respect to PDF files was not the open or proprietory nature of the format but the fact that the format can best be described as "distilled essence of puke". It is perhaps the only software/format in the world that makes MS code look lean and efficient.
</rant>
Kaled.
It's like saying that HTML is messy.
It really depends on how you write in it (or how the application writes in it).
The same exact content and layout can be coded in many different ways in PDF.
It's a very good standard for its purpose. Too bad most writers process data char-by-char.
PDF may fill a technology gap (for authors) but in practice it does so in a way that is dreadful for end-users.
Kaled.