Forum Moderators: phranque
www.mysite.co.uk.
rather then the main visits to
www.mysite.co.uk
I then tried it with dot com sites, and they all work with the extra dot.
Anyone able to explain how or why this happens? Is it just that the punter has put in an extra dot, and its the just the web coping with it, or is there something deeper?
I've tested it does seem to be the case that most web engines just deal with it and ignore the dot. I noticed that webmasterworld has a cookie problem with the extra dot though.
Are you sure this isn't one user that has bookmarked the site complete with the extra dot and visiting multiple times?
TJ
You also get it for something like
[bbc.co.uk....]
The final dot is just ignored and you get the site
My first concern was that it was some vast scam like 302s (of blessed and immortal memory), but that does not seem to be the case.
I have bunged them through a couple of different header viewers, some accept the url with the dot, some give error.
Very odd, perhaps no more than that! I am no whiz in this area, so was trying to tap readers here.
For example this works for me, but you say it did not for you.
[webmasterworld.com....]
The more likely conclusion would be that some ISPs are allowing it in dns. I am using BT broadband in UK. Again I am not enough of a dns expert to really know.
In around 10,000 ad views on the site I noticed it on yesterday, 45 were from the url using the extra dot. I guess 1/2 percent would be the sort of mis-inserting the url one could have expected.
It would appear that its a two way process. I can get sites using the extra dot, and other users can get my sites using the extra dot.
WebmasterWorld with the extra dot does work, but it doesn't realise that it's me - the cookie is not checked and I am not logged in.
TJ
What I mean was are you getting visitors to all of your sites coming in via links with the extra dot at the end? That's why I was thinking it might be a mod_rewrite typo.
I'll investigate that, and try with another site - only put the click checker on the one site so far. Take a while get rsults, as I am only apparently looking for 1/2 of a percent of all clicks
As I say, my first concern was there was something deep going on, I think I am reassured that this is not the case ;)
This final not is not mandatory but nameservers will recognise it (if you think of the '.' as being a delimiter between fields in the name the last '.' is implied)
"Originally, as defined in RFC 1738 (§ 3.1), the "host" portion of a (Common Internet Scheme) URL was always and unequivocally a fully qualified domain name and the conventional mechanism for distinguishing fully-qualified domain names from non-fully-qualified domain names did not apply. Whether it was example.com. or example.com, the host was intended to be the same. "
HTH