Website Validity and Keywords

If the code has errors,keywords, content don't match-reprecussions?

[dustyaz]

After recently spending some time on research and optimization for keywords and content, I have some real concerns.
I recently did keywords and content for a large set of "on the fly" :( reproducing websites.
I was assured that the content and keywords could go into the site in the order requested.
I don't read code well. I am learning, so now that these are complete, I went to the keyword density checkers, validity checkers and got some rather confusing answers.
While I do not expect any of these to be high ranked sites, they at least have to be readable to the search engines or spiders.
I am worried they are not?
I also found that the keywords were used but not the carefully prepared content to match each set. What happens if these are spidered??
Also, I found another set of these, with a differet extension, they had used, and I not sure what purpose. They are written slightly different again from what the request was. They were not to do doorways or hidden text.
Can someone help me? I need to know more.
Thank you so much. dustyaz

[idiotgirl]

Welcome, Dustyaz-

I recently did keywords and content for a large set of "on the fly" reproducing websites... that the content and keywords could go into the site in the order requested.

Are these pages generated by user form input, or some kind of template you created or a template program this entity had previously set up? What is triggering pages to be created on-the-fly? If so, it sounds as if 1.) the template itself may be flawed or 2.) user input is not being screened carefully enough.

If this is some kind of doorway page creator - it sounds as though it may not have been set up exactly right.

Probably if you could explain just a little more about how and why the pages are created - there are people on this board that could help pinpoint the problem.

[dustyaz]

Thank you. As to your questions,these sites are templated by a program our company has, at this point I am not sure if it was an in house creation or a purchased program.
When I go to an html checker I get a ton of errors on the set up, It is imperative that I know if the actual build is faulty and if it will hurt the viability. It seems these templates are completey built out of tables and graphic images. I have printed out the source codes and there seems to be an overabundance of graphics(there is only one actual photo on the page.). I took it to a validator and had it put on a parse tree it showed huge(pages) of gaps between the titles, and the descriptions and body text. When I get a keyword count back, 75% read the code graphics as a keyword. I didn't know if I could give a web address out or not. I only know that I need to either figure out if these are at all 1. valid 2. can be repaired, 3. The company needs to start over! I hope this part helps.
When I went in and built a self built on the same builder, my worst problem was the html I had to clean up. It checked out with a keyword density of 4% and an excellent load time. I did not use their preformat, rather I built it in the online builder from scratch. thanks dustyaz :)