Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

UN Wants to manage the Internet

Article about WSIS conference

         

jbinbpt

6:31 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



In Reuters [reuters.co.uk] and elsewhere......

"What we are looking at is the future management of the Internet. It's not about who owns it or who will be regulating the laws, but what is best way to manage what has become a natural resource for all of humanity," a summit official said.

Scary reading
jb

Chndru

6:34 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's time they woke up :)

snip

[edited by: DaveAtIFG at 8:32 pm (utc) on Dec. 8, 2003]

percentages

7:28 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The unemployed weapons inspectors can be redeployed as spam inspectors and made responsible for ensuring no search engines of mass-destruction get into the wrong hands ;)

I'm sure Leno and Letterman will be able to do something useful with that Reuters report tonight ;)

bird

8:16 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Scary reading

How is this scary? They are discussing the allocation of IP addresses, the assignment of country code top level domains, and similar things. Right now, large parts of those inherently international activities are governed exclusively by US law, which looks much scarier to most people than the UN setting up the rules.

jbinbpt

8:27 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's scary because I don't believe that it is really broken. I agree that there are issues, but I don't believe the UN has the global support for this.
But I also have no better solution.....

jb

plumsauce

11:42 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member




better an international jurisdiction, than
the legacy that we have now.

for example, currently, all ICANN disputes
that go beyond arbitration MUST be dealt with
in Virginia courts under Virginia laws. it is
part of the registrar agreement, even if you it
involves a European Union based registrar like
Gandi.

the Canadian government used to be responsible
for ip allocations in Canada. then someone had
the brilliant idea to delegate this to ARIN. now,
Canadian network admins have to get ip's from ARIN,
who have no accountability to Canadian legislators.

panic

12:47 am on Dec 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"We do see a role for governments, as is recognised in ICANN's structure. However, we are concerned with any efforts to increase governmental involvement at the expense of private sector leadership,"

It was only a matter of time before something like that was said. No matter what happens, I hope it happens for everyone's best interest.

TGecho

2:23 pm on Dec 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Oh just great, give them an inch....

China and Cuba will be among its strongest supporters.

Umm... no offense, but China and Cuba don't exactly have the most freedom loving governments out there. What's up with that?

bcolflesh

2:28 pm on Dec 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Umm... no offense, but China and Cuba don't exactly have the most freedom loving governments out there. What's up with that?

If they get out of line, we can pretend they have a big cache of unallocated IP addresses - they we can invade and liberate them.

dragonlady7

2:49 pm on Dec 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Because the UN is soooo neutral and NEVER gets involved in petty political one-upsmanship. Or anything like that.

Yup, yup. Let's politicize the Internet and see if we can't break it that way, since other efforts haven't managed to destroy it.

*************************
That cynical interlude was brought to you by my realization that the office coffee machine is broken. ^.^

Stefan

2:53 pm on Dec 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



but China and Cuba don't exactly have the most freedom loving governments out there

Ahem... that could be said of many governments, including ones in North America.

All in all, imho, it's best to keep politics out of discussions in WW threads...

TGecho

3:16 pm on Dec 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>> it's best to keep politics out of discussions in WW threads

Yeah, I guess you're right. *turns off computer and backs away in an attempt to resist*

panic

6:06 pm on Dec 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



All in all, imho, it's best to keep politics out of discussions in WW threads...

It usually makes the threads get REAL ugly.

john316

6:28 pm on Dec 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well, if the UN wants to take over the internet, they better clear it with Larry and Sergey.