Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.224.253.82

Forum Moderators: not2easy & rumbas

Message Too Old, No Replies

Number of followers is no longer a valid indicator

Bots crowd Twitter

     
10:08 am on Jun 9, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 19, 2003
posts: 4393
votes: 2


Excerpt from Reuters:
A sample of 10,000 followers was analyzed for each company. A software used a random algorithm to extract a sample selection of followers and two classed of parameters established whether the user's behaviors is most likely to be human or carried out by a bot.

Read from source:
[reuters.com ]
6:45 pm on June 9, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 3, 2002
posts:18903
votes: 0


Spam attracts spam. If you clear the junk from your followers it builds up slowly. If you leave junk there, it seems to rapidly attract huge amounts more.
8:02 pm on June 9, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from FR 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member leosghost is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Feb 15, 2004
posts:6717
votes: 230


A similar analysis was carried out last year in relation to the number of "followers" of a certain US Senator..

It was found that 80% or more of his "followers", were robots set up by his own PR company..the survey then did some more checking and analysis of other twitter accounts with high follower numbers ( those over 1000 or so ) and concluded that 80% of all twitter accounts being "bots" was probably an accurate assessment..