Forum Moderators: coopster
The W3 validator has gone through years of development, and is going to be much better than anything built from scratch in a hurry.
An alternative (also written in perl) is the WDG validator: [htmlhelp.com...]
[jclark.com...]
I sue it locally on my computer all the time and have not noticed differences with W3C in terms of what is valid (in terms of interpretation, etc, yes). That said, I think encyclo is right and you will probably do better with the W3C code since there is probably no validator that is more extensively tested than that.
Tom
I might find a way to send my code to W3C and grab the output with a GET request or somethin'. This thing won't be used very often, it's not worth investing months of development time.
Thanks again! httpwebwitch
I have downloaded SP and I have no idea how to use it. I am usually fairly good with learning unix commands, but not this one.
I have some xhtml 1 transitional documents that I would like to validate, how on earth do i do it?
Eventually I would be doing exactly what you have said - do a system call. And I am not going to build a fully fledged validator, just make note of the pages that dont validate and use w3's validator to get more info.
I have been unable to find any examples on the net...