Forum Moderators: coopster
There are only 2 php files - the first file (thumbs.php)displays thumbnails of all the paintings, and the second file (fullsize.php) displays the fullsize version of the picture whose thumbnail was selected.
Each thumbnail has a link to fullsize.php, and the link also contains the id of the picture to be displayed
Thumbnail 1 links to fullsize.php?id=1
Thumbnail 2 links to fullsize.php?id=2
etc etc etc...
I want the details of individual paintings to appear in search engines - at the moment only the thumbnails page does so.
I've looked at quite a few other posts on this subject, and people appear to be suggesting that Google will ignore URLs that contain a variable named "id", because it thinks it represents the Session ID.
Does anyone know for definite if this is true? If so I'll change the variable name to something different.
Does anyone know for definite if this is true?
yes, it is not true. do a search on google for ...
allinurl: "id="
you will find it does index pages of the type.
...php?id=...
...asp?id=...
now the question you didn't ask which is: how do they rank?
then many people here swear that they do better with url's that look static.
i think in non competitive areas it is not very important.
I've read on other posts that Google is getting much better at spidering sites that contain links in the format url?variable, and I'd like to stick to this way of doing things if possible. It's nice and simple, and I'm not too familiar with session variables yet...
Changing the id variable's name would be extremely easy - it would only take me a few minutes to do a global find/replace and upload it.
But before I do this, I'd just like to know whether it'll actually make a difference in the all seeing eyes of Google.
I accept that from a search engine perspective it might be better to use sessions and not pass variables through urls.
But just to satisfy my curiosity, would a link such as www.widget.com?id=7 be regarded by Google as being different to www.widget.com?anothervariablename=7
We relaunched our site, and saw that google had failed to reindex, or rather display any of our URL that contained the "ID=" After alot of discussions and pressure, they have finally sent back the following reply:
<snip>
So, at least they sorta admit the problem before we start recoding the site and content delivery system
Tog
[edited by: jatar_k at 6:35 pm (utc) on Aug. 23, 2003]
[edit reason] no email quotes, see TOS [webmasterworld.com] [/edit]