Forum Moderators: mack

Message Too Old, No Replies

Search Engines

Does text embedded in graphics count?

         

joe commerce

3:03 am on Sep 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have some text content created by a graphic software. Are these words picked up by SE's?

Thanks

mack

8:35 am on Sep 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The image will be no more than an image. Currently search engines can't read text within an image.

Mack.

Essex_boy

11:24 am on Sep 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



just out of interest, why have you done this?

joe commerce

3:01 am on Sep 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Text in a jpeg. Just wondering if SE's pick it up.

gudrunj

7:22 am on Sep 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



No, they do not pick it up. You could try adding an alt tag if it isn't too disturbing. That will be picked up by search engines.

txbakers

12:20 pm on Sep 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



There are lots of reasons to use text in an image - your design calls for a particular font for example.

There is nothing wrong with using text in an image, just remember that it's slower to load and the SE won't read it (unless it's in an alt).

longen

3:34 pm on Sep 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Couldn’t SE's not carry out OCR on an .jpg image?

mack

3:39 pm on Sep 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Google catalogues uses OCR technology, not sure if it will ever become part of web search.

Mack.

stapel

6:16 pm on Sep 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



longen wrote:
Couldn’t SE's not carry out OCR on an .jpg image?

When you use your scanner to OCR, you have to tell it that you're OCRing a document, rather than just scanning an image. How would a search engine know the difference?

Eliz.

Lord Majestic

6:21 pm on Sep 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Couldn’t SE's not carry out OCR on an .jpg image?

Its way too computationally intensive to be worth it, if you want text to be indexed then keep it as a text not image.

longen

8:04 pm on Sep 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google could use a SETI type network - perhaps even for their normal dance, link analysis, etc

Lord Majestic

8:07 pm on Sep 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google could use a SETI type network

They do not want to introduce dependency on community that could possibly interfer with their own corporate goals. A reasonable and expected decision from any multi-billion company.

OCRing every image is simply not feasible, much better and wiser decision NOT to do it, to force those who want to get ranked to use text.

Beagle

5:08 pm on Sep 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's advisable to use alt tags on your images, anyway, especially if they include text. It's an accessibility issue for vision-impaired people who use text readers to access the web. So since you're, of course ;) , using alt tags already, why add another layer of technology for the SE's?