Forum Moderators: mack

Message Too Old, No Replies

Word, save as web page

can one doc be used for print and web?

         

gettingaclue

9:24 pm on Oct 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



thank you for being here! I need help. My boss has assigned me to be the webmaster since I'm the most computer literate person here, but I'm running into many things I don't know. I got an html book and have written several simple pages from scratch. I'm confident I can learn this, but have no local resources. Now, he's demanding that we use Word 2000 to have one document for both our print and online price list, per Word's written claim of this functionality. Its about 11 pages long in the printed Word doc. I've divided it logically and done links between pages and within pages to different sections. My problems are: the background image not fitting on the page exactly right (white space around the edge), how to enable the user to send us image files to put on our product, how to create a form to join our "club", and how to compose it for both print and online viewing per his "one document" dictum.

Any and all help is MUCH appreciated. Thanks.

crash

9:32 pm on Oct 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Word does not translate very well and it tends to bloat the file size way beyond necessary. You can create your document in Word and then clean it up - alot - to make it work for both but IMHO it really shouldn't be used as a WYSIWYG web editor at all.

Adding:
regarding your background - there is something in the code causing it. Most likely a spacing issue.
regarding sending image files - there are various ways this could be done, do you mean via your website? do you want the image emailed to you or included in a database and uploaded from the site?
regarding your 'club': do you mean forum? There are so many different ways to go about this it's kinda hard to give you any specific answers.

As for 'print and online viewing' where are they printing from? the site or something that your office prints and mails out? If it's from the site - basically every browser has a print function.

[edited by: crash at 9:37 pm (utc) on Oct. 2, 2002]

highman

9:34 pm on Oct 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Cant answer most of your questions, but just as a note, if you search the download area of the microsoft site you will find 'html filter 2.0' I think its called, this will help no end in converting from word to html (it removes most of the crap)

<added> found it here [office.microsoft.com ]

rogerd

9:44 pm on Oct 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member



Dreamweaver also has a function called (no kidding) "Clean up Word HTML". Left unchecked, Word and Excel produce huge bloat.

highman

9:54 pm on Oct 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>Clean up Word HTML

lol... that should be renamed!

txbakers

11:03 pm on Oct 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



You would be much better off creating the web page first, then downloading the page to Word for printing than the other way around.

Word is NOT a web page editor. It never was meant to be and it really renders awful web pages.

deejay

11:20 pm on Oct 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hi gettingaclue - welcome to WebmasterWorld

As has been indicated, Word really isn't the tool for the job.

Now might be the time to start educating your boss - if he wants you to be the webmaster, then he needs to allow you to BE the webmaster... which includes being able to tell him how things should be done :) (it's my favorite part of my job).

What are you using to write your pages?

gettingaclue

7:29 am on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ok, thanks everyone! Let's see if I can reply all at once.

There's multiple chapters in a couple Word "how to" books that say Word can be used to create web pages and have them match the handouts we print to give out. That's where he's coming from and says I'm just not doing something right "cuz the book says..." I even saw an entire big book at Barnes & Noble on creating web pages with Word. From what I've seen, I agree with you all and think they are crazy. But only if I get something up and running at all is he going to listen to me that we'd be better off improving it with something else. Paradox. But where I have to start.

We have an 11 page handout of information and prices that is an existing Word document with 3 to 6 small tables per page, paragraphs of description inbetween. That's what he wants online with essentially no modifications and to only change prices in ONE document and have it reflected both in our print out and web page. From what I've read, it sounds like eventually we need to move to a database driven site, but I have to do something he likes before he'll listen to me and make changes.

Another reason he wants to use Word is because IE offers the "edit with MS Word" option on the File menu, so he insists its meant to work and that way other employees can change the prices when necessary instead of me being the only one with some other web page writer.

We have equipment that prints images on products. He just bought a software package from that manufacturer that stores and organizes the images for the production runs. I'm supposed to figure out how to let users email their image files from our web site to this server.

The "club" is really just a list of email addresses to send announcements and specials to. Right now, I have just an email link. That will work, but he envisions something more "form" looking. This is the lowest priority of the things I'm listing. Getting the site up and presentable fast is #1. Users ability to send image files thru the site is #2.

Regarding the "clean up Word html" links: do you mean I save the page as html in Word, then run this mini-app on the Word created html file before I upload it? I guess that brings me to another question. Word creates a confusing folder and renames all the images used to numbered files in the html doc's folder. Is this standard? Do other web authoring tools do this too?

Deejay asked what I'm using to write the web pages. Word is all I have now, that's the problem I posted about. Is there something else I could use fast?

thanks again everyone!

pageoneresults

8:42 am on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



FrontPage is going to be your best alternative at this point. I've used the Word filters out there and they still leave proprietary MS code that just doesn't cut it in todays quest for clean, valid html. Neither does FrontPage if you use it incorrectly.

I've reviewed a an online program that generates search engine optimized Word pages. I took an example of one of those pages and ran it through the W3C validator. Eek, over 100 errors on a page that could have been built with 2 or 3 tables (for the beginner).

I think you might want to investigate the FrontPage Sharepoint Team Services. It sounds like that aspect of the program will serve your needs and be more compatible with a broader audience. At the same time, you'll have a user friendly WYSIWYG interface to work with.

Good luck! ;)

P.S. I end up taking client supplied Word documents, cutting and pasting them into Notepad (lose all formatting), then cutting and pasting into FP using my preset preferences which produces valid html. Then I have to format based on the original Word doc. Not difficult at all once you get everything in sync.

txbakers

1:00 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Looks to me like you're SOL. A boss with no clue as to what he needs and unwilling to listen to reason.

Good luck with it. It will cost you and him hundreds of hours to fix the mess. Glad it's not me.

Sinner_G

1:09 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I had a word generated page once. Afterwards we cleaned it and the size was just a fourth of what it was previously. So you can tell your boss that his clients will need about four times longer to see the pages if he sticks with word. Tell him that when people wait to long for a page to load, they tend to forget it and look at the next website. Normally the fear of losing clients is enough to make them understand the value of good html.

As for another tool to write your pages on, I would suggest Dreamweaver as a beginner's tool.

rogerd

1:13 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member



Here's another thought, gettingaclue. Design the site as a whole using proper design tools, good quality HTML, and optimization. Put plenty of good content out there. Now, if the boss has a few pages that need frequent updating, just do the Word conversion & slam them out there. I do this on a site where a vendor sends incredibly complex spreadsheets that need to be posted to the web. Saving them as web pages actually results in a page that looks OK in a browser, although the HTML is tortuous indeed. It wouldn't be worth the time to redo these pages each month in proper HTML, so I just grit my teeth and don't worry about the fact that they won't validate and probably won't get properly spidered and indexed. I rely on the rest of the site for that.

MsDetta

1:18 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi, I'm also new to this forum, but I'd like to offer a suggestion to possibly help you. If your boss doesn't want to spend the capital to get FrontPage, try using Netscape's composer which is built right into the browser. You'll have to manually clean up the Word html code, but you should be able to easily fix that white space around the pictures. Hope this is an additional alternative for you.

Sinner_G

1:27 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



rogerd, did you ever look at these pages with a non M$ browser? Like NS 4.7?

rogerd

1:37 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member



We're seeing under 4% Netscape users, and the site itself is fairly low volume. These pages would quite literally take hours to redesign properly, and it isn't worth the effort for data that will change again in a few weeks. The ration of billable design time to monthly Netscape user viewing time would probably be 10 to 1 or worse. So, to get back to the original question, no, I haven't even checked them in NS.

Sinner_G

2:10 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Try it, just to have a good laugh. The biggest problem with 'save as html' in office software (apart from file size) is that they look ok in IE, but terrible on other browsers, particularly NS4.x.

martinibuster

3:02 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Tell him all the above.

Then tell him that just because you can boil an egg, this doesn't qualify you to cook meals at a restaurant. And just because you're computer literate, this doesn't qualify you to design and code a web page.

No offense, but it's not fair for you to buy a book on html and then expect you to whip up a web page. This is much different that using excel or knowing how to swap out a hard drive. It takes more than a couple days to learn the hundreds of nuances of building a web page.

For the amount he's paying you, your boss would be better off paying a student to do it.

engine

3:34 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Why not have the Word file as a download, rather than displaying the prices on the page? Alternatively, and a better solution would be to create a PDF from the Word file and put that up on the web. It's a relatively simple process, when you have the software.

dhdweb

5:18 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



As for another tool to write your pages on, I would suggest Dreamweaver as a beginner's tool.

beginner's tool?

It beats most of the WYSIWYG's I've seen out there!

txbakers

5:50 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes, I think Dreamweaver is an excellent beginner's tool. The code is very clean and although not perfect, it gives the beginner a great template to learn from.

The javascript is pretty bloated, but once in place, it gives a perfect starting point to learn and explore.

I learned ASP from UltraDev. Now I hardly open Dreamweaver anymore, having gleaned the basics from the program.

It's rather pricy, but you can still download the 30 day trial. Take the tutorial, make some pages, then you might not ever need the program again.

toadhall

6:21 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Classic. The boss buys into marketing hype and won't take "but..." for an answer.

Changing one document once is a goal familiar to all of us using dynamic pages (includes and CSS, etc.) so we know where the boss is coming from. If I was convinced of that so-called option (MS Word to HTML) I'd go to bed at night confident the fairies were taking care of everything too. And I'd be right pi**ed-off at any gnome telling me otherwise the next morning. Unfortunately the gnome's going to take the heat when the magic slippers don't fly.

I think engines's suggestion (a .doc or .pdf download option) is the most likely to satisfy both your boss and your customers for the time being. As for the MS option - "tell 'im 'e's dreamin'!"

txbakers

8:17 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I bought Pagemaker 3 just for the "covert to HTML" feature. Gad was that the most AWFUL HTML every written by any creature on this or any planet.

dingman

9:22 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm dealing with a simillar issue by writing a Perl script that munges WordPerfect 9's save-as-html output into the data I want. My script is a 10-kilobyte monstrosity of regular expressions, but it does work. If the word document's contents are going to be sufficiently consistent for you to do this, it might be worth a try. It's been a big headache for me, though, even with much more of a CS background than I infer you have given how you got stuck with the job (I've got a degree and a little work experience as an admin and developer.), so I'm not sure I can offer a whole-hearted reccomendation of this tactic. It is, however, another option.