the find has tons of rugs, huge database by size and color.
"several are generic (irrelevant) discounters like potterybarn, overstock, and macys macys."
irrelevant? all sell rugs - lots of them.
you make some good points (i said finding fault is easy at G), but you're overdoing it don't you think? to me, g's results are clearly superior to bing (while both need obvious improvements).
wondering if you saw this:
talks about affiliates and how bing pays to get people to their engine?
your choice is employing tactics that muck up our ecosystem.
so add immoral (read their lame replies in the report) and poor policing to my earlier assessment.
they've got a long way to go - and it begins by working on not purposely screwing their users.