Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.146.217.179

Forum Moderators: mack

Message Too Old, No Replies

Bing Update 11/20/2009

New SERP's

     
7:52 am on Nov 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 16, 2003
posts:525
votes: 0


Just noticing a new set of SERP's has been rolled out and so far it looks okay minus the wikipedia domination. Why can't every search engine just put a WIKIPEDIA button in their header and skip the listing in the SERPs? :>~
9:12 am on Nov 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator martinibuster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 13, 2002
posts:13964
votes: 119


Bing engineers may need to refine their trust algos. I'm seeing a SERP where Bing is giving a poor quality subdomain a pass because the main domain has a high amount of inbound links (nearly a million). I think Bings method for determining sites likely to be authoritative needs tweaking.

Interestingly, Bing produces another result not seen in the other search engines that is actually pretty good.

7:02 pm on Nov 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 22, 2005
posts:1152
votes: 4


Why can't every search engine just put a WIKIPEDIA button in their header and skip the listing in the SERPs? :>~

Ha. But, no. I like beating out Wikipedia. And I do on G & Y, but, yeah, Bing...

OK, let me go see...
I moved up from 7 to 5 on Bing.
I'm still #1 on Y and G.
Wikipedia is # 1 on Bing, #2 on Y and G.

7:05 pm on Nov 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 22, 2005
posts:1152
votes: 4


Interestingly, Bing produces another result not seen in the other search engines that is actually pretty good.

Likewise. Above me on Bing is a good site and then a very weak one. But, not fair to judge by me right now. We're just finishing a major re-work. We'll see in a few months.

7:12 pm on Nov 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 16, 2003
posts: 615
votes: 0


They're actually not too different from Google's results.
7:54 pm on Nov 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator travelin_cat is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 28, 2004
posts:3114
votes: 2


It's really amazing that the Bing results for my main site are very similar, in fact in some cases much better then Google.
8:12 pm on Nov 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 25, 2003
posts:972
votes: 0


It reminds me of the Google results back when Google was easier to figure out.
9:14 pm on Nov 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

Full Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Apr 12, 2006
posts:290
votes: 0


I saw mention in Bing support forums a few months ago that they'd be rolling out a new update, circa October - I guess this may be it.

Has anyone seen any improvements in their Bing webmaster center indexation and stuff?

1:28 am on Nov 21, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member steveb is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:June 20, 2002
posts:4652
votes: 0


Bing's results are much more Google-like because they are much more complete now, as a lot of powerful domains get more accurate treatment.

I have not seen it, but perhaps also as martinibuster suggests a pwerful domain that has gained more respect to to more accuurate understanding of the domain is also benefiting from weaker subdomians also getting more respect than they deserve. I think that should probably adjust in the coming weeks though as Bing better analyzes the newly more full recognized powerful domain and sees that the powerful domain actually disrespects its own junky subdomain.

4:19 pm on Nov 21, 2009 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 16, 2004
posts:49
votes: 0


I checked some of the keywords in our industry and I really liked the results. If they don't make crucial mistakes, Bing could be a very good alternative to Google.
7:29 am on Nov 22, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tigger is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:July 16, 2000
posts:3558
votes: 0


>They're actually not too different from Google's results.

they are massively different from G, I'm not seeing it cluttered with its usual list of authority sites dominating all the top terms and for me they are offering a much better "real" results rather than just putting links to newspaper sites & wiki everywhere

the problem is getting joe public to use them, but at least Bill's got a small advertising budget he can use LOL

11:33 am on Nov 23, 2009 (gmt 0)

New User

5+ Year Member

joined:Nov 7, 2009
posts:3
votes: 0


But How SEO for Both Bing and Google?
1:22 pm on Nov 23, 2009 (gmt 0)

New User

5+ Year Member

joined:July 8, 2009
posts:6
votes: 0


I've also observed improved rankings for my websites

System

2:42 pm on Nov 27, 2009 (gmt 0)

redhat

 
 


The following message was cut out to new thread by engine. New thread at: msn_microsoft_search/4032719.htm [webmasterworld.com]
2:46 pm on Nov. 27, 2009 (utc 0)
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members