Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

AltaVista Spam Definition

         

Videoace

8:07 pm on Mar 31, 2000 (gmt 0)



Has the time come to provide some real content to the Buddy Links pages? I'm concerned about the spam definition trotted out today by Alta. Take a look - Here.

I realize there are descriptions provided for each site, but is this sufficient? What about "pages whose primary intent is to redirect users to another page"? I don't want to be spooked, but I do want to be very careful.

Brett_Tabke

9:19 pm on Mar 31, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



What do you suggest? What could we possibly add for content? That is the same spam definition they have always used. That is a verbatium copy of what is found elsewhere in their 'spam' files.