Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Thoughts On Links Moving Forward From The Past

Future Of Link Building

         

javelin

2:34 am on Apr 12, 2022 (gmt 0)

Top Contributors Of The Month



I spent a little time reading a few threads on this portion of the forum and found some questions and comments interesting and decided to give my thoughts on the topic.

I have always considered any link given to be as a result of good business. Tied to good business is various kinds of legitimate networking or collaboration. Examples can be partners of existing clients and customers ect...

A tried and true method from older pre internet marketing days is developing good public relations through a non profit means. Helping others in real ways within the real world can go a long way. Aspects such as this require real boots on the ground and doing real business.

In the past years "link building" has managed to develop a dirty feel to it. The name itself evokes an immediate reaction as if it is a shady deal. Truly it does not have to be this way if those who wish to cultivate something real get out from behind a keyboard.

The real issues behind where links are going too few seem to realize. Links are not worth what they used to be. "Building" them by past methods begin to create a cost/benefit that is no longer worth the same effort of the past.

Ahrefs and others can keep promoting articles displaying their importance. Yes they are important, but their value is changing quickly. Webmasters are seeing their positions fall without realizing what they lack is in content, on page authority and depth, and a broader base of keyword bubbles between pages of content.

Google is shifting as fast as they can based upon what technology allows. The numbers to see this happening is there if anyone cares to notice.

Content should always drive the focus. Links should happen naturally due to some need, reason for business, or authentic resource.

TorontoBoy

3:43 pm on Apr 12, 2022 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Links were being sold as a package for insta-page ranking. Of course Google quickly found this out. One of my acquaintances has been banned by Google for using such paid link services. I found it abhorent and told him so. Still he went ahead, did it, and got caught.

I also simply concentrate on content. If there is related link content then great. Otherwise I don't play the links game. Trying to game Google page ranks is not for me.

martinibuster

4:40 am on Apr 13, 2022 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I don't think it's so much that the value of links is less nowadays. It's actually something that's been going on since the beginning in that the value of certain kinds of links matter less and the value of real links (as defined by Google within its black box) still counts, possibly the same as before, maybe even more valuable.

However what everyone in this discussion says about content is correct and what I said about links doesn't change that in any way.

popgek

5:34 pm on Sep 19, 2022 (gmt 0)



Hi! Links are important now - that's for sure. Google is changing but has not yet changed the algorithms and looks at the weight and rating of referring resources. Therefore, links from authoritative, real, thematic partner resources definitely work.:)

tangor

3:11 am on Sep 20, 2022 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



^If it is relevant for the user, is content specific, and avoids all the OTHER problems with mass linking with low value.

I rarely (so rare it is almost never) link to anyone. I never ask for links (and get them out the wahzoo and ignore, even from sites as immense as Wikipedia).

Links, as a ranking factor is just one of those 230 (whatever the current number is) factors involved in "rank", and probably weighted on the low side.