Forum Moderators: martinibuster
If so do they base it on ad unit impressions or ad impressions?
Since skyscraper can have 5 ads vs. a half banner with 1 ad, it makes quite a difference whether they base their calculations on the number of ads or the number of ad unit impressions.
People report better "smart pricing" revenues if they removed low performing ad units. If it were just based on connersion ratio of clicked ads, that shouldn't have much (if any) effect.
Perhaps a bit of smoke-n-mirrors and a bit of reality?
If we (meaning google) with a limited actual conversion data decide to reduce the return on CPC ads because we can't sell them at a higher price...then we will be sure to pass the advertisers savings onto the publisher....by reducing your return.
This model was introduced when google was struggling to gain acceptance for the content side of the advertising mode...a way to reduce costs to advertisers to account for lower ROI than on search results.
The opposite effect is now happening with the introduction of CPM model in an attempt to console publishers with low CTR and revenue.