Forum Moderators: martinibuster
How annoying is that? Does she think that we are all tax-stealing webmasters that are sponsored by some government and creating some crappy websites paid by taxpayer's money? Quality content has its price and all of us somehow have to live from something.
I wanted to write back and tell her this but I pulled myself together and did not. It's very frustrating to try to get inbound links, isn't it? I have written about 50 emails and only got 4 links so far.
In fact, I recently proposed a cool deal (IMO) to a large corporation: they would get high-quality unique content for free, non-exclusive, in exchange for links. Guess what? They refused: "At XYZ Inc. we have the policy to not link to 3rd parties as we cannot guarantee the future quality of the sites linked". Argh!
I guess if large corporations are like this, governments might be even worse! Thus, just don't feel too sad about it, and keep on working.
Never think that sites that display Adsense ads are not quality. The drone that read your email is probably aware that you make money when you sleep.
I get around 30 requests a day and I don't read any of them unless they mention their PR value in the subject line of the communication ;)
If you haven't already, check out forum 12 - Link Development. You can learn the absolute do's and dont's of link exchanges.
Goverment sites are great but it's better when your content is that good that they link to you without a request ;)
As someone suggested you may be more successful, at this time, if you request links from sites that are similar to yours in size and strength. Remember, birds of a feather flock together.
Best bet is to either
- make sure yoou have incoming links and traffic before you pout the advertising on
- live with less incoming links
Ever since I've added adsense I notice I loose incoming links myself.
So not all .edu sites seem the have the same opinion on AdSense ads. My experience, if the content is good, links will come, also .edu links.
We blocked these ads for ethical reasons, and because they did not fit with the quality image of our site. We occasionally monitor the ads being shown to make sure that the quality remains appropropriate.
I can understand that educational establishments would be very concerned by linking to sites that might display such material. It would give the impression that they endorse something that is, in essence, a way of cheating the education system.
I'm not sure there is an answer to this problem. All I'm doing, perhaps, is saying that I can see both sides of the argument, and it isn't immediately obvious what the win-win might be.