Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Annoyed threads. Hate to see.

Here is mine. What are yours?

         

FromRocky

8:30 pm on Jul 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's annoyed to see, not even to read, some threads appeared now and then in this forum. The current my peeve is the thread where poster made a page to aim at a high paying keyword ($85 CPC) and then disappointed due to 7 cent-payout.

"Why did this page about "high paying keyword" only make 7 cents a click?"

How about yours?

The Contractor

8:54 pm on Jul 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The answer to the .07 click is:

They know why they built that page.
I know why they built that page.
You know why they built that page.
Google knows why they built that page.
The advertisers know why they built that page.

So, that's what they think of that page ;)

europeforvisitors

8:56 pm on Jul 30, 2005 (gmt 0)



TheContractor:

I think you've just earned the "Best Post of the Month" award. :-)

linuxguy

9:04 pm on Jul 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



FromRocky, I hate your thread.

Swebbie

9:28 pm on Jul 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Let's all be 'shiny happy people' and never complain. I mean, c'mon, it's only our livelihood. Why get all worked up? LOL Amazing.

bobothecat

9:36 pm on Jul 30, 2005 (gmt 0)



How about yours?

'I got booted from AdSense'...

and...

'AdSense stats haven't updated in the last 5 minutes... is it broken?'...

plus...

'My AdSense income is unusually low today... so everyone else's must be too'

These three threads seem to surface almost everyday... yet we rehash the same ole thing :)

[edited by: bobothecat at 9:50 pm (utc) on July 30, 2005]

ann

9:49 pm on Jul 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"got my check"
"Why are checks late?"
And of course the favorite pet peeve, "check out this website <snip!>" knowing it is against TOS, LOL

Ann

moftary

9:58 pm on Jul 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



For me all adsense threads are important. "Payment arrived" threads give me estimation about my payment delay, "my earnings are low" is funny somehow (and fun is important in our lives of course!) and finally the "I cannot log in to adsense account" thread which put me into a reliefe after thinking that my account was suspended. I dont get annoyed from anything related to adsense :)

roldar

10:02 pm on Jul 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think the "my earnings are low" could be useful if they didn't attract only those people whose earnings are low.

Reading through one of the "my earnings are high/low" threads it looks like 90% of the people are experiencing just that. And then a few posts later you find out that half the people with low income just did a major overhaul of their entire site or were dropped from G.

Maybe if they added a voting feature on the left side of the AdSense forum where we could hit a button for higher, lower, or average earnings it would eliminate a lot of these and provide actual information. But that seems kind of ridiculous, because in the end there's only one account in all of AdSense that matters, and that is mine. <snip>

[edited by: Jenstar at 11:17 pm (utc) on July 30, 2005]
[edit reason] TOS # 24 [/edit]

woop01

10:08 pm on Jul 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Can you imagine how fast Adsense would fail if the general tone of Adsense threads in this forum was symptomatic of the entire program?

I know I personally turned off content network ads on our campaigns due directly to the "money grabbing first, quality later" attitude I saw here about a year or two ago. I later realized that was irrational on my part and with a little work was able to get some great results from the content network leads.

jomaxx

12:49 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Pet peeves:

1. People who complain about low earnings yet fail to specify whether they're talking about pageviews, CTR, earnings per click, or some combination of these things.

2. Threads started by people with no understanding of statistics in general and especially sample size. By logic, 50% of people here are having a below-average day, so posting that "My stats are low today, anyone else seeing the same thing?" is unlikely to yield valid data for extrapolation.

3. Conspiracy theories based on a sample of one, e.g.: "My earnings have been in the toilet lately, Google must have turned the dial way down to they can meet their Q2 numbers".

4. Threads based on the premise that making money on AdSense is "easy" and how do I get in on this deal?

5. Generally speaking, threads which would drag down the credibility of the AdSense program if read by AdSense advertisers. This would include the seven-cent-click complaint mentioned in the first post. It also include threads about which keywords pay the most, buying dodgy traffic, which is the best software for building scraper sites, etc.

kaz

1:19 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How is it possible that I have 2 page impressions and 3 clicks?

calman

1:37 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



In my short time in this forum, some of the most annoying threads have been those that that describe earnings.

The most famous recent one was the "$14,653.27 for the month of June, 2005" thread.

This thread was started by a first time poster who quickly departed the scene and gave us no information as to the reasons for his "success".

This thread really got the troops riled up - the "cheerleaders" versus the "doubters". Speculation ran rampant - even though there was little solid information to speculate about.

It has apparently finally died a well deserved death after 132 posts.

I can't remember a single piece of useful information that I gained from that thread - except to avoid wasting my time reading similar threads in the future.

caspernova

1:43 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



damn i really got flamed for that one... lol

novice

1:47 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Another one of my pet peeves, that hasn't been posted yet, are when someone posts in this forum about why Google will not allow them to publish ads on a site that violates their TOS.

Google does not allow ads on gambling sites, porn sites, drugs.... Although these posts are rare, it still bugs me that people want to argue the issue here.

Swebbie

1:48 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



By logic, 50% of people here are having a below-average day, so posting that "My stats are low today, anyone else seeing the same thing?" is unlikely to yield valid data for extrapolation.

Incorrect. There have been days when AS was burping (May 5 springs to mind) and nearly everyone's earnings were way off their averages. Asking is valid because patterns emerge when nearly everyone here is seeing the same phenomenon. If you don't ask that, how could you know either way? I think the "My stats are low, anyone else seeing the same thing?" threads are highly useful in that sense.

jomaxx

1:54 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



My statement is correct because I used the weasel words "is unlikely to" instead of "cannot ever". The threads can occasionally contain useful information, but since there's one started almost every single day, the amount of misinformation generated by them is much higher IMO.

roldar

1:56 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Asking is valid because patterns emerge when nearly everyone here is seeing the same phenomenon. If you don't ask that, how could you know either way? I think the "My stats are low, anyone else seeing the same thing?" threads are highly useful in that sense.

Whenever I see a thread with that title, and my earnings are not low, I ignore it. I only bother to read it if I happen to be suffering at the time. Therefore, threads of that nature are skewwed. On any given day there are undoubtedly 100's of publishers having their best ever, and 100's having their worst day in recent memory. I've seen both threads appear in a single day.

Swebbie

2:14 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I only bother to read it if I happen to be suffering at the time. Therefore, threads of that nature are skewwed.

Again, you can pick up patterns, trends. May 5 is a perfect example. The "My earnings are way too low" thread that ensued was very long and clearly indicated a widespread phenomenon. If you weren't here or don't remember it, ask around. It was very enlightening.

I'll add that this latest round can be pinned on a big SERPs shake-up at Yahoo. Yet again, it was instructive to have a thread about earnings being a lot lower than average.

Swebbie

2:18 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



By logic, 50% of people here are having a below-average day

That's the part that was incorrect. You cannot infer a 50-50 split from the posters in this forum. Tiny sample size. There'll be days when it's skewed heavily one way or the other.

razinkane

2:23 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The scraper threads... There is nothing new under the SUN until the frackin internet came along and changed it all... Thanks to Al Gore.

jomaxx

2:54 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Swebbie, the actual exact percentage of webmasters here having a below-average day is obviously ever-shifting and unknowable, so that number "50%" wasn't meant to be taken as literally as you are taking it.

To put it more simply, every day is a below-average day for lots and lots of people. That's why there are so many of these threads and that's why they are almost invariably a waste of time. Stick around here long enough and I guarantee you'll get sick of them too.

Swebbie

4:10 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I like those threads, as I said. I don't usually read every post, but I often pick up some new tidbit about checking certain stats or trying to figure out what G, Y, or MSN are looking at when determining rankings. The complainer only starts the thread. Others with ideas often come up with novel things to check.

camper

5:03 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How about threads that confuse "annoyed" with "annoying."

jetteroheller

5:17 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



'My AdSense income is unusually low today... so everyone else's must be too'

This type of thread begining February saved me and brought me a much higher income.

I thought before only in terms of more content to increase my income.

Reading this and seeing my CPM going also down, I started several page optimizations.

Curiosity

5:19 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Newbie: What's a scraper?

Member 1: Scrapers are a plague that is destroying Adsense!

Member 2: Scrapers are perfectly legit members of Adsense!

Member 3: I'm an Adwords advertiser, and here's my opinion of scrapers.

Member 4: I'm a scraper, and here's my opinion of you jealous losers.

Member 5: Google is a scraper! Google is a scraper!

[Insert boilerplate "Google is/is not a scraper" argument. Rinse, lather, repeat.]

moneyraker

8:03 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



If someone asks me too what threads I like to read, I'd say most of what have been mentioned above. I remembered all these threads because I loved reading them, or even immersing myself in them. They give spice and spirit to this very informative forum. We can't be discussing page optimization all the time can we? :)

Back to the topic - my own peeve: posts that contain nothing but a derogatory word or name. It's OK for people to criticize strongly, but they should at least explain what they're criticizing and why.

jdhuk

8:32 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever.

david_uk

8:54 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Just to turn this on it's head a bit, the threads I like to see are the "Three features you'd like to see added" ones.

petra

9:43 am on Jul 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Newbie: What's a scraper?
Member 1: Scrapers are a plague that is destroying Adsense!

Member 2: Scrapers are perfectly legit members of Adsense!

Member 3: I'm an Adwords advertiser, and here's my opinion of scrapers.

Member 4: I'm a scraper, and here's my opinion of you jealous losers.

Member 5: Google is a scraper! Google is a scraper!

[Insert boilerplate "Google is/is not a scraper" argument. Rinse, lather, repeat.]

I nominate Curiosity for post of the year :)

This 34 message thread spans 2 pages: 34