Forum Moderators: martinibuster
I distincly remember nobody receiving any money in the US before the long holiday weekend. Will they do that again? doubtful, as the holiday weekend begins on July 2, though I am not holding my breath waiting. I think everybody's a bit eager this month. It's only the 27th, though I know payments in progress used to begin showing up on the 24th or 25th.
It does say "about" 30 days, so July 5 would be about 35. Close enough?
A few months back, when I was using the check method, I'd probably have my check about this date, bring it to the bank that day and it's there in the account overnight - so this EFT thing doesn't seem to be any faster in comparison to check method a few months back.
You should compare apples to apples :)
If you have check selected for this month, then you still wouldn't have your check this month. You probably won't receive the check for a few more days.
If you have EFT selected for this month, then the day after (or the same day) the Payment in Progress shows up in your Payment History, the money is in your account.
So EFT is still faster.
People that are reporting Payments in Progress via Check still don't have the actual check in their hands (or banks).
YES!
EFT VANCOUVER BC CANADA1!
YES!
Comparing the exact same thing actually - Point I was trying to make is that they appear to have gotten slower over the past few months.
Whoops, I guess I missed that point and got confused by your last question that said EFT doesn't seem any faster than checks in prior months. Something didn't add up there.
Prior months have had varied check delivery and mailing dates, so it seems hard to say that things have gotten any slower over the past few months.
But I still want to be paid on a RIGHT NOW basis, I just don't have the clout to demand it...
EFT in New Mexico, nothing yet.
Whoops, I guess I missed that point and got confused by your last question that said EFT doesn't seem any faster than checks in prior months. Something didn't add up there.
Yeah, I think faster than I type, so sometimes I end up making a complete tit of a what I wanted to say :)
Well, certainly looks like non-US accounts are getting paid first. Kinda weird, but I guess there's some logic to it.
Janethuggard,
I just signed with adbrite and after reading your post I decided not to follow through....LOL, I have enough problems without going out looking for more...Guess what, they sent me an email telling me it was within Googles rules that I could run Google contextual ads as well as their contextual ads...on the same page...I think not. Trying to get me Google banned right out of the gate!
Ann
Guess what, they sent me an email telling me it was within Googles rules that I could run Google contextual ads as well as their contextual ads...on the same page...I think not. Trying to get me Google banned right out of the gate!
Payment record aside, it IS allowed to have Adsense and Adbrite on the same page, because AdBrite is not "contextual". AdSenseAdvisor says "ads that are sold directly by the publisher are ok to display with AdSense, which would include AdBrite."
Here the page where that statement was made by ASA:
[webmasterworld.com...]
Mickey
That may be true but they classed their ads as contextual.
From program policies:
<If you have elected to receive contextually-targeted Google ads, this would include all other contextually-targeted ads or links on the same page as Google ads. This would also include ads throughout the site that mimic Google ads or otherwise appear to be associated with Google on your site.<
Walks like a duck, etc :-)
Besides, didn't like what I read about adbrites payments and bookkeeping LOL
Ann