Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 34.204.191.31

Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google stock falls after report shows slowing ad clicks

     
11:39 pm on Feb 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 28, 2003
posts:105
votes: 1


After years of reliably spectacular performance, Google Inc. is showing a sign that its business is slowing down.

A report released late Monday by comScore Inc. said that the number of clicks by U.S. users on Google's advertisements was flat in January compared with a year earlier, signaling that the Internet titan's growth engine may be sputtering.

[sfgate.com...]

11:45 pm on Feb 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 23, 2004
posts:915
votes: 31


Well, we all knew this day would come. The giant stumbles. Next, the fall. Happens to every internet-centric company, bar none.
11:57 pm on Feb 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member jimbeetle is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Oct 26, 2002
posts:3295
votes: 9


Also here [webmasterworld.com].
12:03 am on Feb 27, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 26, 2006
posts:1397
votes: 0


I'm more disappointed with investors than I am with Google. I'm not an investor in GOOG, but talk about nervous nellies! Did any of them read that news report before selling their stock?!

First, this is only one month (after a solid December). Second, it's only for the U.S. (52% of its global ads). Third, there's isn't enough data to draw significant conclusions.

Consumers may be cutting back on their spending and therefore less interested in clicking on ads. Or advertisers, waylaid by economic malaise, [may be] buying fewer ads.

Jordan Rohan, an analyst with RBC Capital Markets, is exactly right. He said: "We believe that investors' fear over weak-paid click data from comScore is overblown."

Having said that, Google, in my opinion, is not helping the situation by its comments like these:

[Google's executives] explained that they redesigned
the ads so that fewer users would accidentally click on
them. As such, advertisers may be willing to pay more
for each time a user click on the ads, offsetting any
financial hit from a drop in clicks, some analysts said.

Are they talking about that superficial change to recent Google policy which deactivated the ads in the area besides the title and URL? (I can't imagine what else they're referring to.) Do these socalled analysts have any idea how insignificant those changes were?

I have seen no data differences since it was implemented. I don't see hundreds of publishers complaining they've suffered a huge "financial hit," either.

p/g

12:07 am on Feb 27, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

joined:Oct 27, 2001
posts:10210
votes: 0



I'm more disappointed with investors than I am with Google.

Are you sure you don't mean "speculators"?

2:33 am on Feb 27, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 9, 2004
posts:1205
votes: 26


Are you sure you don't mean "speculators"?

Exactly. Check out a chart of Google's stock prices and it will appear suspiciously bubble-like.

[edited by: Atomic at 2:34 am (utc) on Feb. 27, 2008]

2:51 am on Feb 27, 2008 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 19, 2007
posts:487
votes: 0


Up is not forever!...KF (Quote from J.P. Morgan)
2:54 am on Feb 27, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from CA 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member encyclo is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 31, 2003
posts:9074
votes: 6


Continued here: [webmasterworld.com...]